Is Polydioxanone (PDO) threading as effective as minoxidil (Rogaine) for treating hair loss?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

PDO Threading vs. Minoxidil for Hair Loss

Minoxidil is significantly more effective than PDO threading for treating hair loss, with topical minoxidil 5% being the first-line FDA-approved treatment for androgenetic alopecia. 1

Evidence-Based Comparison

Minoxidil Efficacy

  • Topical minoxidil 5% is recommended as the first-line treatment for female pattern hair loss (FPHL) and androgenetic alopecia (AGA), with proven efficacy in maintaining and improving hair density 1
  • Topical minoxidil has demonstrated hair growth ranging from 17% to 70% in various studies of androgenetic alopecia 2
  • In a 48-week randomized controlled trial with 381 women, 5% topical minoxidil was superior to placebo in increasing nonvellus hair count and improving both patient and investigator assessments of hair growth 3
  • Low-dose oral minoxidil (0.25-1.25 mg daily for women; 2.5-5 mg daily for men) has emerged as an effective alternative for patients who cannot tolerate topical formulations 4

PDO Threading Evidence

  • There is a notable absence of high-quality evidence supporting PDO threading for hair loss in the provided literature
  • None of the guidelines or research studies mention PDO threading as an effective treatment for hair loss
  • The British Association of Dermatologists and American Academy of Dermatology guidelines do not include PDO threading in their recommended treatment protocols 1

Treatment Recommendations

First-Line Treatment

  • Topical minoxidil 5% applied once or twice daily is the recommended first-line treatment for androgenetic alopecia 1
  • Allow 6-12 months for visible results, with treatment continuing indefinitely to maintain results 1
  • In a direct comparison study, topical minoxidil showed better overall therapeutic effect than oral minoxidil, though the difference was not statistically significant 5

Alternative Options

  • Low-dose oral minoxidil (0.25-1.25 mg for women; 2.5-5 mg for men) can be considered for patients who cannot tolerate topical formulations 4
  • Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) therapy may be used as an adjunctive treatment, typically consisting of 3-5 sessions at 4-6 week intervals 1
  • Other evidence-based options include oral finasteride 1mg daily (for men), low-level laser therapy, and combination therapies 1

Important Clinical Considerations

Monitoring and Expectations

  • Take baseline photos before starting treatment
  • Evaluate progress at 3,6, and 12 months with standardized photos 1
  • Patients should understand that significant improvements may not be noticeable until the 6-month mark 1
  • Treatment should be continued long-term to maintain results 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Abandoning treatment too early - Minoxidil requires at least 6 months of consistent use before significant results are visible 1
  • Inconsistent application - Poor compliance with twice-daily application is a common reason for treatment failure with topical minoxidil 6
  • Ignoring underlying nutritional deficiencies - Evaluate for iron, zinc, vitamin D, and thyroid function before or alongside treatment 1
  • Using unproven treatments - Many herbal remedies and alternative treatments for hair loss have not been tested in randomized controlled trials 3

In conclusion, there is robust evidence supporting minoxidil as an effective treatment for hair loss, while PDO threading lacks scientific validation for this indication. Patients seeking evidence-based treatment for hair loss should be directed toward FDA-approved options like minoxidil rather than PDO threading.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.