What are the indications for removal of a Nasogastric (NG) tube?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Nasogastric (NG) tubes should be removed when they are no longer clinically necessary, such as when the patient can tolerate oral intake, has return of normal bowel function, or when gastric decompression is no longer needed, as prolonged placement increases the risk of complications including patient discomfort, mucosal damage, and potential for aspiration 1.

Indications for Removal

The following are indications for removal of a Nasogastric (NG) tube:

  • The patient can tolerate oral intake
  • Return of normal bowel function (passing flatus or stool)
  • Gastric decompression is no longer needed
  • Resolution of the original condition requiring placement (such as bowel obstruction, ileus, or need for enteral feeding)
  • Significant decrease in gastric output (less than 100-200 mL over 24 hours)
  • Transitioning to oral medications or alternate feeding routes
  • Development of complications, including nasal erosion or necrosis, inadvertent pulmonary placement, sinusitis, esophageal or gastric erosions, or tube obstruction that cannot be cleared

Considerations for Long-term Feeding Needs

For patients with long-term feeding needs, consider replacing the NG tube with a more permanent feeding solution like a gastrostomy tube, as seen in a study where PEG feeding was compared to nasogastric tube feeding in adults with swallowing disturbances 1.

Balancing Risks and Benefits

The decision to remove an NG tube should balance the risks of continued placement against the benefits, taking into account the patient's individual needs and medical condition, as well as the potential for complications, such as those reported in a study on the effects of early nutrition via PEG in mechanically ventilated patients with stroke or head injury 1.

From the Research

Indications for Removal of a Nasogastric (NG) Tube

The following are indications for removal of a Nasogastric (NG) tube:

  • Nasogastric tube syndrome (NGTS) characterized by throat pain and abductor dysfunction of vocal cords due to the presence of the NGT 2, 3
  • Acute upper airway obstruction caused by vocal cord paralysis or laryngeal infection 3
  • Presence of complications such as basal atelectasis, loss of electrolytes, and increased patient morbidity due to prolonged nasogastric intubation 4
  • Confirmation of safe oral feeding through videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) in acute stroke patients 5
  • Achievement of nutritional requirements through oral alimentation, making the NG tube no longer necessary 6

Specific Conditions for Removal

In certain conditions, the removal of the NG tube may be considered:

  • In patients with nasogastric or nasointestinal ileus tubes, removal of the tube is recommended if symptoms of NGTS occur 3
  • In acute stroke patients with thin liquid aspiration, removal of the NG tube and change to oral feeding with a food thickener may be safe 5
  • In patients undergoing elective bowel surgery, routine use of the nasogastric tube postoperatively may be safely eliminated 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Effect of presence/absence of a nasogastric tube in the same person on incidence of aspiration.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.