Principles of Fluid Stewardship in Clinical Practice
Fluid stewardship requires dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness rather than static measurements, with initial fluid resuscitation of 30 mL/kg crystalloid in sepsis followed by ongoing reassessment using functional hemodynamic measurements to guide further therapy. 1
Core Principles of Fluid Stewardship
1. Initial Assessment and Ongoing Reevaluation
- Thorough clinical examination and evaluation of physiologic variables (heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, temperature, urine output) 1
- Echocardiography for detailed assessment of hemodynamic issues 1
- Regular reassessment of response to treatment is critical for appropriate fluid management 1
2. Dynamic vs. Static Measurements
- The use of central venous pressure (CVP) alone to guide fluid resuscitation is no longer justified 1
- Dynamic measures show better diagnostic accuracy for predicting fluid responsiveness:
- Passive leg raises
- Fluid challenges with stroke volume measurements
- Variations in systolic pressure, pulse pressure, or stroke volume in response to changes in intrathoracic pressure during mechanical ventilation 1
- Pulse pressure variation has demonstrated sensitivity of 0.72 and specificity of 0.91 for predicting fluid responsiveness 1
3. Fluid Selection and Administration
- Initial fluid resuscitation in sepsis begins with 30 mL/kg of crystalloid within first 3 hours 1
- Balanced crystalloids (e.g., lactated Ringer's) are preferred over 0.9% saline due to fewer biochemical abnormalities and adverse clinical outcomes 1
- Further fluid administration should be guided by functional hemodynamic measurements 1
- Consider context-specific approaches:
- Goal-directed protocols may benefit perioperative patients but have shown no benefit in early septic shock 1
4. Timing and Context-Specific Considerations
- Fluid administration should be guided by hemodynamic assessment for specific indications and contraindications 1
- Consider clinical context and history, including timing of the insult 1
- Balance indications for fluid administration against conditions requiring caution 1
- Earlier use of vasoactive medications may be appropriate for some patients with hypotension rather than excessive fluid administration 1
5. Monitoring and Targets
- Target mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg in septic shock requiring vasopressors 1
- Consider normalizing lactate in patients with elevated levels as a marker of tissue hypoperfusion 1
- Regular monitoring of electrolytes, especially sodium, is essential 2
Special Considerations
Terminology and Classification
- Avoid classifying AKI as "pre-renal," "renal," and "post-renal" as these terms can be unhelpful 1
- The term "pre-renal" is often misinterpreted as "hypovolemic" and may encourage indiscriminate fluid administration 1
- Instead, distinguish between conditions that:
- Reduce glomerular function
- Result in injury of tubules and/or glomeruli
- Do both 1
Pediatric Fluid Management
- Use isotonic balanced solutions with appropriate dextrose and potassium for maintenance IV fluids in children 2
- Calculate maintenance fluids using the Holliday-Segar formula:
- First 10 kg: 100 ml/kg/day
- Second 10 kg: 50 ml/kg/day
- Each additional kg: 25 ml/kg/day 2
- Restrict maintenance fluid volume to 65-80% in acutely ill children at risk of increased ADH secretion 2
- Restrict to 50-60% in children with edematous states (heart failure, renal failure, hepatic failure) 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Relying solely on static measurements like CVP to guide fluid therapy 1
- Failing to reassess fluid status regularly after initial resuscitation 1
- Indiscriminate fluid administration without considering potential harms 1
- Not considering "fluid creep" from all sources of fluid intake, including IV medications and line flushes 2
- Using lactate buffer solutions in patients with liver dysfunction 2
- Administering free water intravenously without caution, increasing risk of hyponatremia 2
By following these principles of fluid stewardship, clinicians can optimize fluid management to improve patient outcomes while minimizing complications associated with inappropriate fluid administration.