Initial Management of Ureteric Calculi
For patients presenting with ureteric calculi, initial management should include observation with pain control for stones <10 mm if symptoms are controlled, with medical expulsive therapy as an adjunct treatment option. 1
Assessment and Diagnosis
- Imaging: Non-contrast CT is the gold standard for diagnosis with approximately 97% sensitivity 2
- Stone characteristics to evaluate:
- Size: Critical determinant of spontaneous passage probability
- Location: Proximal, mid, or distal ureter
- Presence of hydronephrosis or obstruction
Management Algorithm
For Stones <10 mm with Controlled Symptoms:
Observation with pain control
- NSAIDs as first-line analgesics (if no contraindications)
- Adequate hydration (>2L/day)
- Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET) with alpha-blockers (e.g., tamsulosin)
- Facilitates stone passage by relaxing ureteral smooth muscle
- Most beneficial for distal ureteral stones >5mm
- Expected absolute increase of 29% in stone passage rates 2
Patient monitoring
For Stones >10 mm or Uncontrolled Symptoms:
Surgical intervention is typically required, as spontaneous passage is unlikely 1
- First-line surgical options:
Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL)
- Stone-free rates: 82% proximal ureter, 73% mid ureter, 74% distal ureter 1
- Lower complication rates (ureteral injury 1-2%)
- Can be performed with minimal anesthesia
Ureteroscopy (URS)
- Higher single-procedure stone-free rates
- Higher complication rates (ureteral injury 3-6%)
- Better for lower pole stones and larger stones
Special Populations
Pregnant Patients:
- Coordinate management with obstetrician 1
- First-line: Observation if symptoms are controlled 1
- If observation fails: URS is preferred over temporary drainage with stent/nephrostomy tube 1
- NSAIDs are contraindicated; avoid CT imaging 1
Pediatric Patients:
- For ureteral stones, stenting prior to URS is not routinely recommended 1
- For renal stones ≤20 mm, either SWL or URS are appropriate first-line options 1
Complications to Monitor
- Infection/sepsis (2-5% with either SWL or URS)
- Ureteral injury (higher with URS: 3-6% vs. SWL: 1-2%)
- Steinstrasse (stone street) formation with SWL (4-8%)
- Stricture formation (1-4%)
Key Considerations
- Stenting is not routinely recommended as part of SWL 1
- Stenting following uncomplicated URS is optional 1
- Patients should be counseled about MET's "off-label" use and potential side effects 1
- Patients should be informed that URS offers better stone-free rates in a single procedure but has higher complication rates 1
Warning Signs Requiring Immediate Attention
- Fever (suggesting infection)
- Uncontrolled pain
- Persistent nausea/vomiting
- Signs of urinary obstruction