What is the effect of PEEP (Positive End-Expiratory Pressure) on intracranial pressure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Effects of PEEP on Intracranial Pressure: Evidence from 1990-2025

Elevated PEEP levels increase intracranial pressure (ICP), particularly in patients with severe lung injury or during the vasospasm period (around day 7) following subarachnoid hemorrhage. 1, 2

Physiological Mechanisms

The relationship between PEEP and ICP is mediated through several mechanisms:

  • Venous return impairment: High PEEP decreases cerebral venous return and increases intracranial venous pressure, potentially raising ICP 2
  • Cerebral blood flow changes: PEEP can indirectly affect cerebral perfusion by decreasing mean arterial pressure (MAP), especially in patients with disturbed cerebrovascular autoregulation 3
  • Intracranial compliance: PEEP reduces intracranial compliance, making the brain more susceptible to ICP increases from expanding lesions 4

Key Research Findings

Effects on ICP in Different Patient Populations

  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients:

    • A prospective observational study found that patients with PEEP of 20 cmH₂O had significantly higher ICP on post-bleed day 7 (19.5 vs 11 mmHg) compared to those with PEEP of 5 cmH₂O 1
    • Day 7 is critical as it corresponds with maximal vasospasm, which can cause cerebral ischemia and edema 1
  • Patients with severe neurologic injuries:

    • In patients with severe lung injury (PaO₂/FiO₂ <100), every 1 cmH₂O increase in PEEP was associated with a 0.31 mmHg increase in ICP and a 0.85 mmHg decrease in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) 1, 2
    • Patients with normal lung compliance showed no significant ICP changes with PEEP increases 1
  • Brain-injured patients:

    • Early studies (1978-1981) demonstrated that ICP responses to PEEP depend on intracranial compliance 5, 6
    • Patients with normal volume-pressure response (VPR <2 torr) showed no significant ICP changes with PEEP therapy 5
    • Patients with abnormal VPR and normal lung compliance experienced significant ICP increases or CPP decreases with PEEP 5

Recruitment Maneuvers

  • Continuous positive airway pressure recruitment maneuver (CRM):

    • Associated with higher ICP (20.50 ± 4.75 vs 13.13 ± 3.56 mmHg) and lower CPP compared to baseline 1
    • No significant improvement in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio 1
  • Pressure control recruitment maneuver (PCRM):

    • No significant effect on ICP but increased CPP 1
    • Clinically significant improvement in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (108.5 to 203.6) 1

Clinical Management Algorithm

  1. Assess baseline risk factors:

    • Intracranial compliance status (if available)
    • Lung compliance
    • Timing post-hemorrhage (especially for SAH patients)
    • Severity of lung injury (PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio)
  2. For patients requiring PEEP:

    • Low risk patients (normal intracranial compliance, early post-bleed period):

      • PEEP up to 15 cmH₂O may be safely applied 1, 7
      • Monitor for hemodynamic changes that could affect cerebral perfusion
    • High risk patients (abnormal intracranial compliance, day 7 post-SAH, severe lung injury):

      • Consider ICP monitoring before applying PEEP >5 cmH₂O 1, 2, 6
      • Use pressure control recruitment maneuver rather than continuous positive airway pressure recruitment 1
      • Maintain MAP to preserve cerebral perfusion pressure 3
  3. Monitoring during PEEP therapy:

    • Continuous ICP monitoring in high-risk patients
    • Maintain CPP >60-70 mmHg by supporting MAP as needed 2
    • Consider CSF drainage capability if available 1

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Rapid PEEP withdrawal: Can cause significant ICP elevations in patients with abnormal intracranial compliance 5
  • Overreliance on PEEP: Higher mortality has been associated with high PEEP ventilation compared to low PEEP ventilation in some studies 1
  • Ignoring timing: The effect of PEEP on ICP may be more pronounced during the vasospasm period (around day 7 for SAH) 1
  • Neglecting MAP: PEEP-induced decreases in MAP should be corrected to maintain cerebral perfusion, especially in patients with disturbed cerebrovascular autoregulation 3

The evidence suggests that PEEP should be carefully titrated in neurologically injured patients, with close monitoring of both pulmonary and cerebral parameters to balance adequate oxygenation with optimal cerebral perfusion.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.