What is the progression-free period for osimertinib (Tagrisso) in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Progression-Free Period for Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

The median progression-free survival (PFS) with osimertinib monotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC is 18.9 months for first-line treatment, while osimertinib combined with chemotherapy extends this to 25.5 months. 1

First-Line Osimertinib Treatment Data

Osimertinib Monotherapy

  • In the FLAURA phase III randomized trial, osimertinib demonstrated superior efficacy compared to earlier generation EGFR-TKIs (erlotinib or gefitinib):
    • Median PFS: 18.9 months vs. 10.2 months (HR 0.46, P<0.001) 1, 2
    • Median duration of response: 17.2 months vs. 8.5 months 1
    • Objective response rate: 80% (similar to standard EGFR-TKIs at 76%) 2
    • Lower incidence of CNS progression: 6% vs. 15% 1
    • Fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events: 34% vs. 45% 1, 2

Osimertinib Plus Chemotherapy

The FLAURA2 trial demonstrated that adding chemotherapy (pemetrexed plus platinum) to osimertinib further improves outcomes:

  • Median PFS: 25.5 months vs. 16.7 months with osimertinib alone (HR 0.62, P<0.001) 1, 3
  • Median duration of response: 24.0 months vs. 15.3 months 1, 3
  • Higher rate of grade 3 adverse events, primarily due to chemotherapy-related toxicities 1, 3

Special Populations

  • Patients with CNS metastases at baseline: Median PFS with osimertinib plus chemotherapy was 24.9 months vs. 13.8 months with osimertinib alone 1
  • Patients with L858R exon 21 mutations: Median PFS with osimertinib plus chemotherapy was 24.7 months vs. 13.9 months with osimertinib alone 1

Overall Survival Data

  • Median overall survival with osimertinib monotherapy: 38.6 months vs. 31.8 months with earlier generation EGFR-TKIs (HR 0.8, P=0.046) 1, 4
  • 18-month survival rate: 83% with osimertinib vs. 71% with standard EGFR-TKIs 2

Progression After Osimertinib

For patients who progress on osimertinib first-line therapy, subsequent treatment options include:

  • Amivantamab plus chemotherapy: Median PFS of 6.3 months vs. 4.2 months with chemotherapy alone (HR 0.48, P<0.001) 1
  • Amivantamab plus lazertinib plus chemotherapy: Median PFS of 8.3 months 1

Uncommon EGFR Mutations

  • Osimertinib shows activity in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations:
    • Overall response rate: 47.6% (higher in first-line setting at 63.6%) 5
    • Median duration of response: 7.9 months 5
    • Patients with G719X-compound mutations show better outcomes (median PFS 13.7 months) 5

Clinical Implications

  • Osimertinib monotherapy remains a standard first-line option for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC
  • The combination with chemotherapy offers improved PFS but with increased toxicity
  • Treatment selection should consider:
    1. Presence of CNS metastases (favors osimertinib-based therapy)
    2. Specific EGFR mutation type (exon 19 deletion vs. L858R)
    3. Patient's ability to tolerate potential chemotherapy-related adverse events

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • PFS benefits with combination therapy come with increased toxicity (grade ≥3 AEs: 64% with combination vs. 27% with monotherapy) 1
  • Resistance to osimertinib eventually develops in most patients, commonly via EGFR T790M mutation 1
  • PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy is less effective in EGFR-mutated NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression 1
  • Regular monitoring for disease progression is essential, with median time to progression around 18.9 months for monotherapy and 25.5 months for combination therapy

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.