Role of FibroTest (FibroScore) in Assessing and Managing Liver Fibrosis
FibroTest is a valuable non-invasive serum marker for assessing liver fibrosis with high diagnostic accuracy, particularly for detecting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, but should be used as part of a comprehensive fibrosis assessment strategy rather than as a standalone test. 1
Diagnostic Performance of FibroTest
Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
- FibroTest demonstrates superior performance compared to indirect markers:
- Meta-analysis results:
Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC)
- FibroTest shows excellent diagnostic accuracy:
- Outperforms FIB-4 and APRI for diagnosing significant fibrosis and cirrhosis 1
Alcoholic Liver Disease (ALD)
- High diagnostic performance:
Advantages of FibroTest
Direct measurement of fibrosis markers: Unlike indirect markers (APRI, FIB-4), FibroTest analyzes substances directly related to extracellular matrix turnover and liver fibrosis 1
High diagnostic accuracy: Particularly strong for detecting cirrhosis with specificity up to 91% 1, 2
Validated across multiple liver diseases: Effective in CHB, CHC, ALD, and NAFLD 1, 4
High negative predictive value: In primary care settings, FibroTest values below 0.58 have a negative predictive value of 94% for advanced fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease 3
Prognostic value: Similar or higher prognostic value compared to biopsy in patients with CHC, CHB, or ALD 4
Limitations and Caveats
False results:
- False-negative results can occur due to acute inflammation
- False-positive results may occur due to hemolysis 1
Practical constraints:
- Time-consuming due to multiple indicators required
- Higher cost limits widespread use 1
Suboptimal accuracy: While valuable, FibroTest has suboptimal accuracy in detecting significant fibrosis in some patient populations 2
Need for proper interpretation: Results must be interpreted in clinical context and with awareness of potential confounding factors 1
Implementation in Clinical Practice
Recommended Algorithm for Liver Fibrosis Assessment:
Initial screening: Use simple, inexpensive tests like FIB-4 or APRI
Second-line testing:
- If initial tests are indeterminate or suggest advanced fibrosis, proceed to FibroTest or elastography
- For NAFLD/NASH: Consider FibroTest with elastography (Fibroscan with XL probe) 5
Result interpretation:
Consider combination approaches:
Monitoring and Follow-up
- FibroTest can be used for monitoring fibrosis progression or regression during treatment
- For patients with normal FibroTest but persistent risk factors: Repeat testing in 3-5 years 5
- For patients with advanced fibrosis (high FibroTest values): Referral to hepatology 5
- For patients with cirrhosis (very high FibroTest values): Referral for HCC screening and management 5
Conclusion
FibroTest serves as an effective non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy with high diagnostic accuracy across various liver diseases. It is particularly valuable for excluding advanced fibrosis and identifying cirrhosis, though its accuracy for intermediate stages of fibrosis is more limited. When used appropriately—either alone or in combination with elastography—FibroTest can significantly reduce the need for invasive liver biopsies while providing reliable information for clinical decision-making.