How are Smith fractures categorized?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Smith Fracture Classification

Smith fractures are classified into three types based on the Thomas classification, with types I and III typically managed conservatively when reduction is anatomic and stable, while type II and unstable type III fractures require internal fixation. 1

Classification System

Smith fractures (also known as reverse Colles fractures) are volar angulated distal radius fractures that can be categorized as follows:

Type I

  • Simple transverse fracture with volar displacement of the distal fragment
  • Conservative treatment is usually sufficient if reduction is anatomic and stable 1

Type II

  • Oblique fracture line running from dorsal-distal to volar-proximal
  • Requires internal fixation due to inherent instability 1, 2
  • Volar buttressing technique with AO-T-plate is recommended 1

Type III

  • Volar-displaced intra-articular fracture
  • Conservative treatment is acceptable for stable fractures 1, 3
  • Unstable fractures require internal fixation 1

Treatment Considerations

Conservative Management

  • Appropriate for type I and stable type III fractures
  • Requires anatomic reduction and stability 1
  • Careful monitoring for displacement is essential

Surgical Management

  • Indicated for all type II fractures and unstable type III fractures 1, 2
  • Volar buttressing technique with plate fixation is the preferred approach 1
  • Metal removal is advised after three months to prevent complications from bone overgrowth 2

Outcomes

  • Functional outcomes after surgical treatment are generally good to excellent (77.2%) regardless of fracture type 3
  • No significant correlation between anatomical result and functional outcome, though good anatomical results usually accompany good functional outcomes 3
  • When comparing Smith fractures to Colles fractures (dorsal displacement), there is no significant difference in functional outcomes after surgical plate fixation 4

Clinical Pearls

  • Careful radiographic assessment is crucial for proper classification and treatment planning
  • For surgical cases, early intervention provides better outcomes
  • Removal of hardware after three months prevents complications from bone overgrowth 2
  • Regular follow-up with radiographic evaluation is essential to monitor healing and detect any displacement

The Thomas classification system for Smith fractures provides a practical framework for treatment decision-making, with the stability of the fracture being a key determinant in choosing between conservative and surgical approaches.

References

Research

[Treatment of Smith fractures (author's transl)].

Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie, 1977

Research

Operative treatment of Smith's fracture.

The Netherlands journal of surgery, 1984

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.