Management of Ulcerative Colitis with Clinical Improvement but New Abnormal White Blood Cell Count
Endoscopic assessment is strongly recommended for a patient with ulcerative colitis who has shown clinical and biomedical improvement but now has an abnormal white blood cell count to determine the underlying cause and guide appropriate treatment decisions. 1
Evaluation of the Abnormal White Blood Cell Count
When a patient with UC presents with an abnormal white blood cell count despite clinical improvement, several potential causes should be considered:
Medication-related effects:
- Immunomodulators (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine) commonly cause leukopenia
- Biologics may affect white blood cell counts
- Corticosteroid withdrawal can affect WBC counts
Persistent subclinical inflammation:
- Despite clinical improvement, underlying inflammation may persist
- Abnormal WBC may indicate ongoing disease activity not reflected in symptoms
Infection:
- Opportunistic infections in immunosuppressed patients
- C. difficile infection (more prevalent in UC patients with increased morbidity and mortality) 1
Diagnostic Approach
The following step-wise approach is recommended:
Repeat complete blood count to confirm the abnormality
Assess other inflammatory markers:
- C-reactive protein (CRP)
- Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
- Fecal calprotectin (FC)
- Fecal lactoferrin
Stool studies:
- C. difficile testing (toxin assay or PCR)
- Stool culture and sensitivity
- Parasitic examination
Endoscopic assessment:
- The AGA recommends endoscopic assessment rather than empiric treatment adjustment for UC patients with discordance between symptoms and biomarkers 1
- Endoscopy with biopsies can evaluate for:
- Degree of mucosal healing
- Presence of CMV colitis
- Other causes of inflammation
Interpretation of Biomarkers
When evaluating the significance of the abnormal WBC in the context of other biomarkers:
If fecal calprotectin is <150 μg/g and CRP is normal: The abnormal WBC may not indicate active inflammation 1, 2
If fecal calprotectin is >150 μg/g or CRP is elevated: This suggests possible ongoing inflammation despite clinical improvement 1
If WBC is low (<3000): This may be related to immunomodulator therapy and not necessarily indicate active disease 3
Treatment Recommendations
Based on the diagnostic findings, the following treatment approaches are recommended:
If endoscopy confirms mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1):
- Continue current therapy with close monitoring of WBC
- Consider dose adjustment of immunomodulators if leukopenia is present
- Higher remission maintenance rates are observed in patients who continue immunomodulators after achieving mucosal healing 3
If endoscopy shows active inflammation:
If infection is identified:
- Treat the specific infection
- Consider temporary reduction of immunosuppression if appropriate
Monitoring and Follow-up
- Repeat WBC count in 2-4 weeks to monitor trends
- Serial fecal calprotectin measurements every 3-6 months 2
- Follow-up endoscopy in 6-12 months to assess mucosal healing
Important Considerations
Do not rely solely on symptoms: Clinical remission without mucosal healing is associated with higher relapse rates
Avoid prolonged corticosteroid exposure: This predisposes patients to increased perioperative complications if surgery becomes necessary 6
Consider medication-specific monitoring:
- For patients on thiopurines: Monitor complete blood count, liver function tests
- For patients on biologics: Monitor for immunogenicity and drug levels when available
Treatment goals: The ultimate aim is to achieve not only clinical and endoscopic remission but also histological remission to improve long-term outcomes 1
By following this algorithmic approach, the underlying cause of the abnormal white blood cell count can be identified and appropriate management instituted to optimize outcomes for the patient with ulcerative colitis.