What is the purpose of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) in bone cancers?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Purpose of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) in Bone Cancers

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is strongly recommended for high-grade osteosarcoma (category 1 evidence) to improve survival outcomes, facilitate limb-sparing surgery, and provide prognostic information through assessment of tumor response. 1

Primary Purposes of NACT in Bone Cancers

1. Improved Survival Outcomes

  • NACT combined with surgery has dramatically improved survival rates in high-grade osteosarcomas
  • The Multi-Institutional Osteosarcoma Study (MIOS) demonstrated that 6-year event-free survival was significantly higher with adjuvant chemotherapy compared to surgery alone (61% vs 11%) 1
  • Modern protocols using NACT and surgery have improved survival rates to nearly 80% for patients with localized disease 2

2. Facilitation of Surgical Resection

  • Reduces tumor size and extent, making surgical excision easier and less extensive 3
  • Enables limb-sparing surgery in 90-95% of patients who would otherwise require amputation 2
  • Creates a reactive zone around the tumor that facilitates surgical margins 1
  • Allows for better functional outcomes compared to amputation 1

3. Assessment of Chemotherapy Response

  • Provides critical prognostic information through histologic evaluation of tumor necrosis 1
  • Good histologic response (>90% tumor necrosis) strongly correlates with improved survival 1
  • The 5-year disease-free survival rates are significantly better in good responders: 67.9% vs 51.3% in poor responders (p<0.0001) 1
  • The 5-year overall survival rates are 78.4% vs 63.7% for good vs poor responders (p<0.0001) 1
  • Allows for potential modification of post-operative chemotherapy based on response 3

4. Treatment of Micrometastatic Disease

  • Addresses subclinical metastases that are present but undetectable at diagnosis 4
  • Prevents or delays development of distant metastases, particularly to the lungs 3

Treatment Approach Based on Bone Cancer Type

High-Grade Osteosarcoma

  • NACT is standard of care (category 1 recommendation) 1
  • Common regimens include combinations of:
    • Doxorubicin, cisplatin, and high-dose methotrexate (most frequently used) 1
    • May also include ifosfamide and etoposide 1
  • After surgery, continue same chemotherapy if good response (<10% viable tumor) 1
  • For poor responders (≥10% viable tumor), continuing with the same regimen or switching to a different regimen are both options, though studies show no clear benefit to changing regimens 1

Low-Grade Osteosarcoma

  • NACT is not indicated; wide surgical excision alone is the standard treatment 1
  • This includes low-grade intramedullary and surface osteosarcomas 1

Periosteal Osteosarcoma

  • Evidence is mixed regarding benefit of NACT
  • A systematic review of 291 patients found no statistically significant improvement in mortality with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy 1
  • Wide excision is the primary treatment, with chemotherapy considered if high-grade elements are found on pathology 1

Chondrosarcoma

  • Generally chemoresistant; NACT is rarely used 3
  • Surgical excision is the primary treatment 2

Important Considerations and Caveats

  1. Response Assessment:

    • Histologic response to NACT is one of the strongest prognostic factors 1
    • Repeat imaging should be performed after NACT to reassess tumor resectability 1
  2. Patient Selection:

    • Selected elderly patients may benefit from immediate surgery rather than NACT 1
    • Patients with metastatic disease at presentation have poorer outcomes with NACT compared to those with localized disease 1
  3. Treatment Limitations:

    • Increasing doses of preoperative chemotherapy does not improve the rate of good histologic response or survival 5
    • Attempts to improve outcomes in poor responders by modifying adjuvant chemotherapy have been unsuccessful 1
  4. Multidisciplinary Approach:

    • Treatment should be administered by experienced oncologists in reference institutions with appropriate infrastructure 1
    • Close monitoring for toxicity is essential, with appropriate supportive care 1

NACT has transformed the treatment landscape for bone cancers, particularly high-grade osteosarcoma, by improving survival, enabling limb preservation, and providing valuable prognostic information through assessment of tumor response.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.