What does TI-RADS (Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) 4 indicate?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

TI-RADS 4: High Suspicion for Thyroid Malignancy

TI-RADS 4 indicates a thyroid nodule with high suspicion for malignancy, with approximately 32-84% positive predictive value for malignancy, requiring fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy for definitive diagnosis. 1, 2

Understanding TI-RADS Classification

The American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) is a standardized classification system that stratifies thyroid nodules based on ultrasound characteristics to:

  • Predict probability of malignancy
  • Guide management decisions
  • Reduce unnecessary biopsies

The TI-RADS scoring system assigns points based on specific ultrasound features:

  • Composition
  • Echogenicity
  • Shape
  • Margins
  • Echogenic foci (calcifications)

TI-RADS 4 Characteristics

TI-RADS 4 nodules typically demonstrate:

  • Moderately suspicious ultrasound features
  • Total point score of 7 or more on the ACR TI-RADS scoring system
  • Higher risk of malignancy compared to TI-RADS 3 nodules
  • May show features such as:
    • Solid or predominantly solid composition
    • Hypoechogenicity
    • Irregular margins
    • Taller-than-wide shape
    • Microcalcifications

Management Recommendations for TI-RADS 4

For TI-RADS 4 nodules, management depends on size:

  • ≥1.0 cm: FNA biopsy recommended
  • 0.5-0.9 cm: FNA biopsy if ≥TR5, follow-up if TR4
  • <0.5 cm: Usually observation rather than FNA

Clinical Significance and Risk Assessment

  • TI-RADS 4 nodules have a significantly higher risk of malignancy than lower categories
  • Studies show 32-84% positive predictive value for malignancy in TI-RADS 4 nodules 2, 3
  • No TI-RADS 2 or 3 nodules were associated with Bethesda category V or VI (suspicious or malignant) diagnoses in research studies 4
  • A high TI-RADS score (4-5) was indicative of papillary thyroid carcinoma in 29.4% of subcentimeter nodules 3

Pitfalls and Considerations

  • Benign nodules may be misclassified as TI-RADS 4 due to overlapping features
  • Histopathological features like fibrosis can mimic suspicious sonographic features 5
  • Some benign nodules with fibrosis demonstrate "taller than wide" appearance, leading to higher TI-RADS scores 5
  • Follicular epithelial hyperplasia in benign nodules may present with irregular margins and hypoechogenicity 5

Multimodal Approach to Improve Accuracy

For nodules classified as TI-RADS 4 where there is diagnostic uncertainty, additional ultrasound techniques may improve diagnostic accuracy:

  • Shear wave elastography
  • Super microvascular imaging
  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
  • Artificial intelligence-assisted interpretation 6

These approaches may help reduce unnecessary biopsies while still identifying clinically significant malignancies.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.