What is the role of thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) in managing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) is not currently recommended as a standard tool for managing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in major clinical guidelines, though it may have value as a research tool for hemodynamic assessment.

Understanding Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance

Thoracic electrical bioimpedance is a non-invasive method for measuring cardiac output and other hemodynamic parameters. It works by:

  • Applying a small electrical current across the thorax
  • Measuring changes in impedance that correlate with cardiac output
  • Providing continuous measurements without operator skill requirements

Current Evidence for TEB in Pregnancy

Limited research has evaluated TEB in pregnancy:

  • A 1989 study showed good correlation (r = 0.91) between TEB and thermodilution measurements of cardiac output in peripartum patients 1
  • A 2007 longitudinal study used TEB to track hemodynamic changes during the second half of pregnancy, demonstrating increasing heart rate, decreasing stroke volume, and stable cardiac output 2
  • A 2016 prospective cohort study found that women who later developed hypertension or preeclampsia had significantly increased cardiac output early in pregnancy as measured by bioimpedance cardiography 3

Clinical Guidelines on Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Current guidelines from major organizations do not specifically recommend TEB for routine management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy:

  1. The International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) 2018 guidelines focus on:

    • Blood pressure measurement
    • Proteinuria assessment
    • Clinical symptoms evaluation
    • Laboratory tests 4
  2. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines emphasize:

    • Non-pharmacological management
    • Pharmacological treatment with methyldopa, labetalol, or nifedipine
    • Close monitoring of blood pressure 4
  3. Recent guidelines summarized in Praxis Medical Insights highlight:

    • Blood pressure targets of 110-140/85 mmHg for non-severe hypertension
    • First-line treatments including labetalol, methyldopa, and nifedipine
    • Home blood pressure monitoring as a useful adjunct to clinic visits 5

Standard Management of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy

The cornerstone of management remains:

  1. Blood pressure monitoring and control:

    • Target BP 110-140/85 mmHg 4, 5
    • First-line medications: methyldopa, labetalol, nifedipine 4, 5
    • Severe hypertension (≥160/110 mmHg) requires immediate treatment 5
  2. Laboratory assessment:

    • Proteinuria evaluation (24-hour collection or spot protein/creatinine ratio)
    • Renal and liver function tests
    • Complete blood count 4
  3. Fetal monitoring:

    • Ultrasound for fetal growth
    • Amniotic fluid assessment
    • Doppler studies when indicated 4

Potential Role of TEB in HDP Management

While not currently recommended in guidelines, TEB could potentially:

  1. Provide early identification of women at risk for preeclampsia through detection of hemodynamic changes 3
  2. Guide fluid management in severe preeclampsia
  3. Help differentiate between various hypertensive disorders based on hemodynamic profiles
  4. Monitor response to antihypertensive therapy

Limitations of TEB in Pregnancy

Several factors limit widespread adoption:

  1. Lack of large-scale validation studies specific to pregnancy
  2. Absence from major clinical guidelines
  3. Potential technical challenges in late pregnancy due to altered thoracic geometry
  4. Limited evidence for improved clinical outcomes when used to guide management

Conclusion

While thoracic electrical bioimpedance shows promise as a non-invasive tool for hemodynamic assessment in pregnancy, current guidelines do not recommend its routine use in managing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Standard management continues to focus on blood pressure control, laboratory assessment, and fetal monitoring. Further research is needed to determine whether incorporating TEB into clinical practice would improve maternal and fetal outcomes in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.