What is an EJ (Ewald) Tube?
An EJ (Ewald) tube is a type of orojejunal (OJ) tube that is inserted through the mouth into the jejunum for enteral feeding and/or gastrointestinal decompression when gastric feeding is not possible or contraindicated. 1
Types and Terminology
EJ tubes fall within the broader category of enteral access devices that can be classified based on:
Entry point:
- Natural orifice access: Through mouth (orojejunal/OJ) or nose (nasojejunal/NJ)
- Artificial access: Through abdominal wall (percutaneous)
Placement method:
- Blind placement: Without visualization
- Endoscopic guidance: Using endoscopy for visualization
- Image guidance: Using fluoroscopy, ultrasound, or other imaging
Placement Techniques
EJ tubes can be placed using several techniques:
- Blind placement: Traditional method but has lower success rates
- Endoscopic guidance:
- Assisted placement devices:
- Bedside magnet (95% success rate in small studies)
- Electromagnetic transmitter with bedside monitor
- Gastric electromyography using EKG leads 1
Clinical Applications
Indications
Enteral nutrition when gastric feeding is contraindicated:
GI decompression:
- Small bowel obstruction
- GI fistula
- Concurrent feeding and decompression 1
Advantages of Jejunal Feeding
- Decreased length of hospital stay
- Reduced infectious complications
- Lower overall healthcare costs compared to parenteral nutrition 1
Comparison with Other Jejunal Access Methods
EJ vs. PEJ (Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy)
- PEJ: Direct primary access to jejunum through abdominal wall
- Advantages of PEJ over EJ:
- Longer tube patency
- Lower rate of tube dysfunction (19% vs 36% requiring intervention)
- Better for long-term jejunal feeding (>4 weeks) 2
EJ vs. PEG-J (PEG with Jejunal Extension)
- PEG-J: Jejunal extension tube placed through an existing gastrostomy
- When to use PEG-J:
- Patient already has PEG in place
- Temporary jejunal access needed
- Direct PEJ placement technically difficult 2
Practical Considerations
- EJ tubes require more frequent replacement than percutaneous options
- Tube dysfunction is common with orojejunal tubes
- For long-term jejunal feeding needs, direct PEJ is preferred over EJ tubes due to lower reintervention rates 2
- Modern techniques using ultra-thin endoscopes and steel guidewires have improved placement success rates 3
Complications and Limitations
- Inadvertent displacement back into stomach (common with drag-and-pull method) 1
- Tube clogging (reported in 4% of cases) 4
- Inadvertent removal (reported in 16% of cases) 4
- Limited evidence supporting bedside placement devices 1
For patients requiring long-term jejunal feeding, transitioning from an EJ tube to a more permanent solution like PEJ should be considered to reduce complications and reinterventions.