Evaluation of Hematuria in a 68-Year-Old Female with Pelvic Calcification on X-ray KUB
For a 68-year-old female with hematuria and a pelvic calcification of uncertain significance on X-ray KUB, CT urography is strongly recommended as the next diagnostic step to determine the cause of hematuria, as this has the highest sensitivity (92%) and specificity (93%) for detecting urinary tract pathology. 1
Interpretation of Current X-ray KUB Findings
The current X-ray KUB shows:
- Nonobstructive bowel gas pattern
- Copious stool throughout the colon
- Residual air in the transverse colon
- No visible urolithiasis
- Mid-pelvic calcification of uncertain significance (possibly uterine fibroid or bladder stone/calcification)
Risk Assessment for Urologic Malignancy
This patient has several risk factors that warrant thorough evaluation:
- Age >60 years (patient is 68)
- Female gender
- Presence of hematuria
- Unexplained pelvic calcification
Diagnostic Algorithm
Initial Laboratory Evaluation
- Complete urinalysis to confirm hematuria and assess for pyuria, bacteriuria, crystals, and casts
- Complete metabolic panel including BUN, creatinine, and electrolytes
- Urine culture to rule out infection
- Urine cytology to evaluate for malignant cells
Imaging Studies
- CT Urography is the preferred imaging modality for this patient given:
Specialist Referral
- Urology referral is indicated due to:
- Presence of gross hematuria
- Age >60 years
- Uncertain pelvic calcification that could represent bladder pathology
- Consider nephrology referral if evidence of renal dysfunction (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m²) is found
- Urology referral is indicated due to:
Differential Diagnosis of Hematuria with Pelvic Calcification
Urinary Tract Pathology
- Bladder stone or calcification
- Bladder malignancy with calcification
- Urolithiasis (though not visible on current X-ray)
- Urothelial carcinoma
Gynecologic Causes
- Calcified uterine fibroids
- Ovarian calcifications
- Gynecologic malignancy with calcification
Other Considerations
- Vascular calcifications
- Phleboliths
- Calcified lymph nodes
Important Considerations
X-ray KUB alone is insufficient for evaluating hematuria, particularly in high-risk patients. The American College of Radiology notes that "radiography (KUB) is generally not appropriate in the initial evaluation of isolated nonpainful, nontraumatic hematuria" 2
Never attribute hematuria to anticoagulant therapy without proper evaluation - these patients still require complete workup 1
The risk of malignancy with gross hematuria is greater than 10%, necessitating prompt and thorough evaluation 3
Cystoscopy should be considered in this patient given her age and the presence of hematuria, regardless of imaging findings, as recommended by the American Urological Association 1
Do not assume the pelvic calcification is benign without definitive characterization through advanced imaging