What is the Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) procedure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) Procedure

TCAR is a promising hybrid carotid revascularization technique that uses direct carotid access and flow reversal to reduce stroke risk during carotid stenting, particularly beneficial for high-risk surgical patients with specific anatomical considerations. 1

Procedure Overview

TCAR combines surgical and endovascular approaches with these key components:

  1. Direct Carotid Access:

    • Surgical cut-down to expose the common carotid artery
    • Completely bypasses the aortic arch, eliminating embolism risk from arch cannulation 1
    • Requires a small incision at the base of the neck
  2. Flow Reversal System:

    • Creates "dynamic" flow reversal through an ex vivo common carotid artery to femoral vein shunt
    • Reverses blood flow away from the brain during the procedure
    • Serves as primary mechanism for procedural stroke reduction 1, 2
  3. Stent Deployment:

    • Placement of carotid stent via the direct carotid access
    • Currently uses conventional single-layer stents in most cases
    • Stent is deployed under flow reversal protection

Anatomical Requirements

TCAR has specific anatomical considerations that must be met:

  • Disease-free common carotid artery at puncture site
  • Common carotid artery diameter ≥6mm
  • Internal carotid artery diameter between 4-9mm
  • ≥5cm distance from clavicle to carotid bifurcation
  • Minimal to no common carotid artery puncture-site atherosclerosis 1, 3

Clinical Outcomes

  • Stroke Risk: Similar in-hospital stroke/death rates compared to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) 1
  • Cranial Nerve Injury: Significantly lower rate (0.3%) compared to CEA (3.8%) 4
  • Technical Success: High rates (98.7%) reported in clinical trials 5
  • Flow Reversal Duration: No significant association between duration of flow reversal and neurologic complications 2

Ideal Candidates

TCAR has potential to become the preferred treatment modality for:

  • Higher-risk patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis
  • Patients with high lesions extending to second cervical vertebra
  • Cervical spine immobility
  • Post-CEA restenosis
  • Prior neck irradiation
  • Hostile neck anatomy
  • Patients with severe aortic or femoral artery pathology that makes transfemoral CAS challenging 1

Potential Complications

  • Carotid Dissection: Most common procedural complication, often occurring during sheath placement 6
    • Management depends on ability to engage true lumen:
      • Endovascular repair preferred when true lumen is accessible
      • Open surgical repair more common when multiple access attempts fail 6
  • Stroke: Overall low rate (1.3%) in high-volume centers 2

Current Limitations and Considerations

  • Lack of prospective randomized evidence comparing TCAR with transfemoral CAS
  • European guidelines view TCAR as promising but requiring further RCT evidence before recommending as alternative to CEA in symptomatic patients 1
  • First-generation single-layer stents used in TCAR may not provide adequate protection against post-procedural cerebral events 1
  • Combining flow reversal with anti-embolic stents may further improve outcomes 1

Eligibility Assessment

Studies show approximately 68-72% of carotid arteries in patients selected for revascularization meet TCAR eligibility criteria 3. Of arteries considered high-risk for transfemoral CAS, about 69% are eligible for TCAR, making it a viable alternative for many patients 3.

TCAR represents an important evolution in carotid intervention, particularly for high-risk surgical patients with specific anatomical considerations, though further comparative studies with CEA and newer-generation stents are needed to fully establish its role in carotid disease management.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.