Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) Procedure
TCAR is a promising hybrid carotid revascularization technique that uses direct carotid access and flow reversal to reduce stroke risk during carotid stenting, particularly beneficial for high-risk surgical patients with specific anatomical considerations. 1
Procedure Overview
TCAR combines surgical and endovascular approaches with these key components:
Direct Carotid Access:
- Surgical cut-down to expose the common carotid artery
- Completely bypasses the aortic arch, eliminating embolism risk from arch cannulation 1
- Requires a small incision at the base of the neck
Flow Reversal System:
Stent Deployment:
- Placement of carotid stent via the direct carotid access
- Currently uses conventional single-layer stents in most cases
- Stent is deployed under flow reversal protection
Anatomical Requirements
TCAR has specific anatomical considerations that must be met:
- Disease-free common carotid artery at puncture site
- Common carotid artery diameter ≥6mm
- Internal carotid artery diameter between 4-9mm
- ≥5cm distance from clavicle to carotid bifurcation
- Minimal to no common carotid artery puncture-site atherosclerosis 1, 3
Clinical Outcomes
- Stroke Risk: Similar in-hospital stroke/death rates compared to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) 1
- Cranial Nerve Injury: Significantly lower rate (0.3%) compared to CEA (3.8%) 4
- Technical Success: High rates (98.7%) reported in clinical trials 5
- Flow Reversal Duration: No significant association between duration of flow reversal and neurologic complications 2
Ideal Candidates
TCAR has potential to become the preferred treatment modality for:
- Higher-risk patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis
- Patients with high lesions extending to second cervical vertebra
- Cervical spine immobility
- Post-CEA restenosis
- Prior neck irradiation
- Hostile neck anatomy
- Patients with severe aortic or femoral artery pathology that makes transfemoral CAS challenging 1
Potential Complications
- Carotid Dissection: Most common procedural complication, often occurring during sheath placement 6
- Management depends on ability to engage true lumen:
- Endovascular repair preferred when true lumen is accessible
- Open surgical repair more common when multiple access attempts fail 6
- Management depends on ability to engage true lumen:
- Stroke: Overall low rate (1.3%) in high-volume centers 2
Current Limitations and Considerations
- Lack of prospective randomized evidence comparing TCAR with transfemoral CAS
- European guidelines view TCAR as promising but requiring further RCT evidence before recommending as alternative to CEA in symptomatic patients 1
- First-generation single-layer stents used in TCAR may not provide adequate protection against post-procedural cerebral events 1
- Combining flow reversal with anti-embolic stents may further improve outcomes 1
Eligibility Assessment
Studies show approximately 68-72% of carotid arteries in patients selected for revascularization meet TCAR eligibility criteria 3. Of arteries considered high-risk for transfemoral CAS, about 69% are eligible for TCAR, making it a viable alternative for many patients 3.
TCAR represents an important evolution in carotid intervention, particularly for high-risk surgical patients with specific anatomical considerations, though further comparative studies with CEA and newer-generation stents are needed to fully establish its role in carotid disease management.