What are the treatment recommendations for patients with anosmia (loss of smell) secondary to COVID-19 that has lasted over 2 years?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Recommendations for Long-Term COVID-19 Related Anosmia

For patients with anosmia secondary to COVID-19 that has persisted for over 2 years, olfactory training should be recommended as the first-line treatment due to its safety profile and evidence of effectiveness, while other interventions should only be considered within clinical trials.

Understanding COVID-19 Related Anosmia

Post-viral olfactory loss (PVOL) from COVID-19 occurs through several mechanisms:

  • Inflammation of olfactory clefts
  • Damage to olfactory epithelium
  • Involvement of ACE2 receptors on sustentacular cells
  • Local inflammation rather than direct neural damage 1

While most COVID-19 related anosmia resolves spontaneously within weeks, approximately 10-20% of patients experience persistent symptoms beyond 6 months, with some cases lasting years.

Evidence-Based Treatment Approach

First-Line Treatment: Olfactory Training

  • Recommended for all patients with persistent anosmia 2, 1
  • Implementation protocol:
    • Systematic exposure to 4 different strong odors (typically rose, eucalyptus, lemon, and clove)
    • Practice twice daily for at least 12 weeks
    • Sniff each odor for 10-20 seconds with focus and concentration 1
    • Continue for at least 3 months, with potential benefit from longer training periods

Second-Line Treatments (Limited Evidence)

  • Intranasal corticosteroids:

    • Evidence is insufficient to provide a firm recommendation for or against use 2
    • Studies show conflicting results:
      • One RCT found no significant difference between mometasone furoate nasal spray plus olfactory training (62% recovery) versus olfactory training alone (52% recovery) (p=0.31) 3
      • Another RCT showed no significant effect of nasal betamethasone on recovery time compared to placebo 4
  • Intranasal insulin:

    • Limited evidence from one small RCT showing significantly higher olfactory detection scores with intranasal insulin fast-dissolving film 2
    • Not recommended as standard treatment due to insufficient evidence
  • Systemic corticosteroids:

    • Very limited evidence from one small study (18 participants) using oral steroids combined with nasal irrigation 5
    • The evidence regarding benefits and harms is very uncertain
    • Not recommended outside clinical trials due to potential side effects and limited evidence

Special Considerations

Monitoring and Follow-up

  • Assess olfactory function using validated tools when available
  • Evaluate for development of parosmia (distorted smell), which may predict recovery of aspects of quantitative smell loss 6
  • Consider referral to specialized smell and taste clinics for patients with severe or persistent symptoms beyond 6 months

Safety Concerns

Advise patients about safety issues related to anosmia:

  • Install gas and smoke alarms
  • Check food expiration dates carefully
  • Be cautious with gas appliances 1

Quality of Life Impact

  • Persistent anosmia significantly decreases quality of life and should be addressed proactively 1
  • Patients with parosmia report increased anxiety and decreased quality of life 6
  • Prepare patients for the possibility that symptoms may persist for years 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Assuming spontaneous recovery will occur - While common in the first few months, recovery becomes less likely after 6-12 months
  2. Overreliance on unproven therapies - Many proposed treatments lack sufficient evidence
  3. Dismissing the psychological impact - Anosmia significantly affects quality of life and mental health
  4. Inadequate duration of olfactory training - Training must be continued for at least 12 weeks to show benefit

Conclusion

The evidence for treating persistent COVID-19 related anosmia is limited. Olfactory training represents the safest and most evidence-supported intervention, while other pharmacological treatments should be considered experimental until more robust evidence emerges.

References

Guideline

Anosmia Treatment Following COVID-19 Infection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.