Differentiating Between Transudative and Exudative Pleural Effusions
Light's criteria are the gold standard for differentiating between transudative and exudative pleural effusions, with a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 72% for identifying exudates. 1
Light's Criteria
A pleural effusion is considered an exudate if it meets at least one of the following criteria:
- Pleural fluid/serum protein ratio > 0.5
- Pleural fluid/serum LDH ratio > 0.6
- Pleural fluid LDH > 2/3 upper limit of normal serum LDH 2, 1
Laboratory Tests for Differentiation
Primary Tests
Total protein in pleural fluid and serum
- Traditionally, exudates have protein levels >30 g/L and transudates <30 g/L
- However, this alone is insufficient when values are close to the cutoff 2
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in pleural fluid and serum
- Essential component of Light's criteria
- Some evidence suggests a cutoff of >0.66 times the upper limit of normal might be more accurate ("modified Light's criteria") 2
Albumin gradient (serum albumin minus pleural fluid albumin)
Additional Helpful Tests
NT-proBNP in serum or pleural fluid
Pleural fluid cholesterol
- Can improve diagnostic accuracy when combined with Light's criteria
- A pleural fluid/serum cholesterol ratio has shown high sensitivity for neoplastic effusions 3
Pleural fluid appearance
- Should always be noted during thoracentesis
- Grossly bloody fluid suggests malignancy, pulmonary embolism with infarction, trauma, benign asbestos pleural effusions, or post-cardiac injury syndrome 2
Imaging Findings
Imaging cannot reliably replace biochemical analysis for transudate-exudate differentiation 2, but certain patterns may be helpful:
Ultrasound: Complex septated, complex non-septated, or homogeneously echogenic patterns typically indicate exudates, while hypoechoic effusions can be either transudates or exudates 2
CT scan: Should be performed with contrast enhancement when needed for further evaluation 2
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Misclassification of transudates as exudates:
- Occurs in approximately 20-25% of cases, particularly in patients on diuretics
- Use albumin gradient >1.2 g/dL to correctly reclassify these cases 1
Unnecessary thoracentesis:
Overreliance on a single test:
- No single method perfectly differentiates transudates from exudates
- Consider clinical context alongside laboratory values 4
Algorithm for Differentiating Pleural Effusions
- Perform thoracentesis and collect both pleural fluid and serum samples
- Apply Light's criteria
- If Light's criteria suggest exudate but clinical picture suggests transudate (e.g., heart failure, cirrhosis):
- Calculate albumin gradient (if >1.2 g/dL, likely transudate)
- Consider measuring NT-proBNP (if >1500 μg/mL, likely cardiac)
- For exudates, perform additional testing based on clinical suspicion:
- Glucose (low in rheumatoid disease, empyema, TB, malignancy)
- pH (low pH <7.2 suggests infection, rheumatoid disease, malignancy)
- Amylase (elevated in pancreatitis, esophageal rupture, malignancy)
- Cytology (can diagnose malignancy in 60% of cases) 2
By systematically applying these laboratory tests and considering clinical context, clinicians can accurately differentiate between transudative and exudative pleural effusions, guiding appropriate management.