What imaging should be ordered for a patient with spleen pain after transfusion of Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Imaging for Splenic Pain Post-Transfusion of PRBCs

For a patient with splenic pain after PRBC transfusion, contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis is the first-line imaging modality of choice.

Diagnostic Approach

Initial Imaging

  • CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast is the gold standard for evaluating splenic pathology with sensitivity and specificity approaching 96-100% 1
  • IV contrast is crucial for proper evaluation as non-contrast CT has significantly lower sensitivity for detecting visceral organ and vascular injuries 1
  • Delayed-phase imaging helps differentiate active bleeding from contained vascular injuries 1

Specific Considerations for Post-Transfusion Splenic Pain

When evaluating splenic pain after PRBC transfusion, the CT should focus on:

  1. Splenic enlargement/rupture: Transfusion-related complications may include splenic enlargement
  2. Vascular abnormalities: Look for:
    • Active contrast extravasation
    • Pseudoaneurysms
    • Arteriovenous fistulas
    • Contrast blush (occurs in ~17% of cases and predicts failure of non-operative management) 1

Alternative Imaging Options

If CT with contrast is contraindicated:

  1. Ultrasound (US):

    • Can be used as an initial screening tool
    • Less sensitive than CT but can detect free fluid and gross splenic abnormalities
    • When used without contrast, has lower sensitivity but can identify "suspicious" findings with 93% sensitivity for splenic injury 2
    • Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) increases visualization of splenic injuries and complications 1
  2. MRI:

    • Consider when CT is contraindicated and detailed tissue characterization is needed
    • On T1-weighted images, normal splenic signal intensity is less than hepatic tissue
    • On T2-weighted images, spleen shows higher signal intensity than liver 3

Clinical Considerations

Warning Signs Requiring Urgent Imaging

  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Decreasing hematocrit
  • Worsening abdominal pain
  • Left shoulder pain (referred pain from diaphragmatic irritation)

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Relying on non-contrast CT: Without IV contrast, CT has significantly reduced sensitivity for detecting splenic injuries (only 38% of parenchymal injuries visible) 2

  2. Overlooking delayed complications: Some splenic complications may develop hours to days after the initial event

  3. Inadequate follow-up: For patients with identified splenic abnormalities, appropriate follow-up imaging may be needed:

    • For low-grade injuries (AAST grade I-II), routine post-discharge follow-up CT is not necessary 1
    • For higher-grade injuries, follow-up imaging may be warranted, particularly with decreasing hematocrit 1

Management Implications

The imaging findings will guide management decisions:

  • Normal imaging: Conservative management with observation
  • Splenic injury without active bleeding: May be managed non-operatively with close monitoring
  • Active extravasation or vascular abnormalities: May require angiography/angioembolization or surgical intervention

In summary, contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis remains the cornerstone of evaluation for splenic pain following PRBC transfusion, providing detailed information about splenic architecture, vascular integrity, and potential complications.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Imaging of the spleen: CT with supplemental MR examination.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 1994

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.