Imaging for Splenic Pain Post-Transfusion of PRBCs
For a patient with splenic pain after PRBC transfusion, contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis is the first-line imaging modality of choice.
Diagnostic Approach
Initial Imaging
- CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast is the gold standard for evaluating splenic pathology with sensitivity and specificity approaching 96-100% 1
- IV contrast is crucial for proper evaluation as non-contrast CT has significantly lower sensitivity for detecting visceral organ and vascular injuries 1
- Delayed-phase imaging helps differentiate active bleeding from contained vascular injuries 1
Specific Considerations for Post-Transfusion Splenic Pain
When evaluating splenic pain after PRBC transfusion, the CT should focus on:
- Splenic enlargement/rupture: Transfusion-related complications may include splenic enlargement
- Vascular abnormalities: Look for:
- Active contrast extravasation
- Pseudoaneurysms
- Arteriovenous fistulas
- Contrast blush (occurs in ~17% of cases and predicts failure of non-operative management) 1
Alternative Imaging Options
If CT with contrast is contraindicated:
Ultrasound (US):
- Can be used as an initial screening tool
- Less sensitive than CT but can detect free fluid and gross splenic abnormalities
- When used without contrast, has lower sensitivity but can identify "suspicious" findings with 93% sensitivity for splenic injury 2
- Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) increases visualization of splenic injuries and complications 1
MRI:
- Consider when CT is contraindicated and detailed tissue characterization is needed
- On T1-weighted images, normal splenic signal intensity is less than hepatic tissue
- On T2-weighted images, spleen shows higher signal intensity than liver 3
Clinical Considerations
Warning Signs Requiring Urgent Imaging
- Hemodynamic instability
- Decreasing hematocrit
- Worsening abdominal pain
- Left shoulder pain (referred pain from diaphragmatic irritation)
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Relying on non-contrast CT: Without IV contrast, CT has significantly reduced sensitivity for detecting splenic injuries (only 38% of parenchymal injuries visible) 2
Overlooking delayed complications: Some splenic complications may develop hours to days after the initial event
Inadequate follow-up: For patients with identified splenic abnormalities, appropriate follow-up imaging may be needed:
Management Implications
The imaging findings will guide management decisions:
- Normal imaging: Conservative management with observation
- Splenic injury without active bleeding: May be managed non-operatively with close monitoring
- Active extravasation or vascular abnormalities: May require angiography/angioembolization or surgical intervention
In summary, contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis remains the cornerstone of evaluation for splenic pain following PRBC transfusion, providing detailed information about splenic architecture, vascular integrity, and potential complications.