Is Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) considered a culture contaminant in blood cultures?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) is NOT a Blood Culture Contaminant

Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) is a true pathogen and should never be dismissed as a contaminant in blood cultures. When isolated from blood cultures, it represents a clinically significant infection requiring prompt treatment.

Pathogenic Nature of GBS

GBS is a gram-positive coccus that causes invasive disease primarily in:

  • Newborns (early-onset and late-onset disease)
  • Pregnant women
  • Adults with underlying medical conditions (especially diabetes mellitus and cancer) 1

Clinical Significance in Different Populations

  1. Neonates:

    • Leading cause of neonatal sepsis and meningitis
    • Case-fatality rates of 4-6% in recent years, but up to 20-30% in preterm infants 1
    • Acquired vertically through exposure to GBS from the vagina of a colonized mother
  2. Pregnant/Postpartum Women:

    • Causes urinary tract infections, amnionitis, endometritis, and wound infections
    • Associated with stillbirths and premature delivery 1
  3. Non-pregnant Adults:

    • Causes skin/soft tissue infections, bacteremia, genitourinary infections, and pneumonia
    • Higher mortality rates (15-32%) than in neonates 1
    • Particularly virulent in elderly and immunocompromised patients

Distinguishing Pathogens from Contaminants

The CDC guidelines for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections clearly distinguish between true pathogens and contaminants in blood cultures 1:

  • True Pathogens: Organisms like GBS are recognized pathogens when cultured from blood and are not considered contaminants
  • Contaminants: Common skin contaminants include diphtheroids, Bacillus spp., Propionibacterium spp., coagulase-negative staphylococci, or micrococci

GBS is specifically listed as a recognized pathogen, not as a potential contaminant, in the CDC laboratory-confirmed BSI criteria 1.

Clinical Implications

When GBS is isolated from blood cultures:

  • Immediate action required: Start appropriate antimicrobial therapy
  • Investigation needed: Identify the source of infection (e.g., skin/soft tissue, urinary tract, endocarditis)
  • No repeat cultures necessary: Unlike with potential contaminants, a single positive blood culture with GBS is clinically significant

High-Risk Conditions Associated with GBS Bacteremia

  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Advanced age
  • Malignancy
  • Immunosuppression
  • Skin breakdown or ulcers
  • Recent surgery

Potential Complications of GBS Bacteremia

If left untreated, GBS bacteremia can lead to severe complications including:

  • Infective endocarditis 2
  • Streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome 3
  • Necrotizing fasciitis
  • Meningitis
  • Septic arthritis
  • Osteomyelitis

Treatment Considerations

For confirmed GBS bacteremia:

  • First-line treatment: Intravenous penicillin G
  • Alternative: Ampicillin
  • For penicillin-allergic patients: Clindamycin (if susceptible) or vancomycin
  • Duration typically 10-14 days depending on source and complications

Conclusion

GBS is a significant pathogen with substantial morbidity and mortality. When isolated from blood cultures, it represents true infection requiring prompt and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Unlike common skin contaminants that may require multiple positive cultures to confirm significance, a single positive blood culture for GBS should be considered clinically relevant and treated accordingly.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Group B streptococcal infective endocarditis.

Journal of infection and public health, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.