Type 2B von Willebrand Disease: Interpreting Normal vWF Antigen with Ratio of 0.7 and Platelet Drop
A normal von Willebrand factor antigen level with a VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio of 0.7 and transient thrombocytopenia strongly suggests Type 2B von Willebrand Disease. 1
Diagnostic Interpretation
The clinical picture presents three key findings that point to Type 2B von Willebrand Disease:
- Normal vWF antigen level - This is consistent with Type 2 VWD where antigen levels can be normal (30-200 IU/dL) 1
- VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio of 0.7 - This is at the borderline cutoff for Type 2 VWD diagnosis 1, 2
- Significant platelet drop with recovery - This is a hallmark feature of Type 2B VWD 1, 3
Understanding Type 2B VWD Pathophysiology
In Type 2B VWD:
- There is a gain-of-function mutation causing spontaneous binding of large vWF multimers to platelets 3
- This leads to clearance of both large multimers and platelets from circulation 1, 3
- The result is intermittent thrombocytopenia that can be mild to severe 3
- Thrombocytopenia may be exacerbated by stress, infection, or pregnancy 3, 4
Laboratory Findings in Type 2B VWD
Type 2B VWD typically shows:
- VWF:RCo <30 IU/dL
- VWF:Ag 30-200 IU/dL (normal to slightly decreased)
- VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio <0.5-0.7
- Loss of high molecular weight multimers
- Enhanced ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) at low doses 1
Important Diagnostic Considerations
Borderline ratio interpretation: A ratio of 0.7 is at the upper cutoff for Type 2 VWD diagnosis. Guidelines recommend cutoffs ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 2
Laboratory variability: A single normal ratio measurement does not exclude Type 2A or 2B VWD in patients with typical bleeding history 5
Thrombocytopenia pattern: The transient drop in platelet count with recovery is particularly characteristic of Type 2B VWD 1, 3
Complete diagnostic workup: Multimer analysis showing absence of large multimers is essential for confirming diagnosis 1, 5
Diagnostic Algorithm
Confirm Type 2B diagnosis:
Rule out other Type 2 variants:
Monitor for clinical implications:
Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid
Relying on a single test: Multiple tests and clinical correlation are required for accurate diagnosis 1, 5
Ignoring borderline results: A ratio of 0.7 is borderline and should not be dismissed 1, 2
Missing variable thrombocytopenia: Platelet counts can fluctuate within the same individual over time 3
Overlooking pre-analytical variables: Sample collection, processing, and storage can affect test results 1
Failing to screen family members: Due to the hereditary nature of VWD, first-degree relatives should be screened 1
The combination of normal vWF antigen, borderline ratio, and transient thrombocytopenia is highly suggestive of Type 2B VWD, warranting further specialized testing for confirmation and appropriate management.