Spinal Cord Injury Levels and Classification
Spinal cord injuries are classified by anatomical level and severity, with cervical injuries (approximately 55% of cases) having the most devastating impact on mortality, morbidity, and quality of life due to their effects on respiratory function and upper extremity mobility. 1
Anatomical Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Levels
Cervical Spine (C1-C8)
- C1-C4: Most severe injuries, often resulting in tetraplegia with respiratory compromise
- C1-C3: Usually require ventilatory support due to diaphragm paralysis
- C4: Preserves some diaphragmatic function but limited respiratory reserve
- C5: Highest level recommended for clinical trials in acute stage due to respiratory failure risk 1
- C6: Preserves shoulder and elbow flexion; deterioration from C6 to C5 can mean difference between relative independence and complete dependence on caregivers 1
- C7-C8: Preserves triceps and some hand function
Thoracic Spine (T1-T12)
- T1-T9: Affects trunk stability and intercostal muscles
- T10-T12: Thoracolumbar junction injuries with better prognosis than higher thoracic injuries 1
- Thoracic injuries (T4-T9) show less neurological recovery compared to thoracolumbar or lumbar injuries 1
Lumbar Spine (L1-L5)
- L1-L2: Junction with thoracic spine
- L2-L5: Lower motor neuron injuries with better recovery potential
- Lumbar injuries demonstrate the greatest neurologic recovery due to higher concentration of lower motor neurons and "root escape" phenomenon 1
Sacral Spine (S1-S5)
- Affects bowel, bladder, and sexual function
- Better prognosis for recovery than higher injuries
Neurological Classification Systems
ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)
The American Spinal Injury Association classification is the gold standard for neurological assessment 2:
- ASIA A: Complete injury - no sensory or motor function preserved in sacral segments S4-S5
- ASIA B: Incomplete injury - sensory but not motor function preserved below the level of injury including S4-S5
- ASIA C: Incomplete injury - motor function preserved below the level of injury with more than half of key muscles below the level having muscle grade less than 3/5
- ASIA D: Incomplete injury - motor function preserved below the level of injury with at least half of key muscles below the level having muscle grade of 3/5 or more
- ASIA E: Normal - normal sensory and motor function
AO Spine Classification System 3
Divides the spine into four anatomical regions:
- Cervical superior (C0-C2)
- Cervical subaxial (C3-C7)
- Thoracolumbar (T1-L5)
- Sacral (S1-S5, including coccyx)
With injury types:
- Type A: Compression injuries
- Type B: Distraction/tension injuries (inherently unstable)
- Type C: Translation injuries
Neurological State Classification 3
- N0: Intact neurological state
- N1: Transient neurological symptoms
- N2: Radiculopathy
- N3: Incomplete spinal cord or cauda equina injury
- N4: Complete spinal cord injury
- NX: Not evaluable
Clinical Significance of Injury Level
- Respiratory Function: Cervical injuries above C5 often require ventilatory support
- Upper Limb Function: Critical for independence in activities of daily living
- Mobility: Lower thoracic and lumbar injuries may preserve walking ability with assistive devices
- Bladder/Bowel Control: Sacral function determines continence
- Sexual Function: Determined by level and completeness of injury
Prognostic Factors
- Level of injury: Lower level injuries have better functional outcomes 1
- Completeness of injury: Incomplete injuries (ASIA B-D) have better recovery potential than complete (ASIA A) injuries 4
- Sacral sparing: Presence of sacral sensation is a positive prognostic indicator 1
- Sphincter function: Recovery of voluntary external anal/urethral sphincter contraction correlates with bladder recovery 1
- Ankle spasticity: Highly predictive of neurogenic bladder dysfunction in thoracolumbar injuries 1
Important Considerations
- Thoracolumbar injuries from T11-T12 to L1-L2 and lumbosacral injuries from L1-L2 to S5 have different pathophysiology and recovery potential due to the presence of lower motor neurons in the conus medullaris and cauda equina 1
- The anatomic level of injury based on neurological examination is a better predictor of recovery than the radiological fracture location 1
- Initial neurological assessment may be unreliable due to factors such as cognitive impairment, intoxication, concomitant head injury, or neurogenic shock 1
Understanding the level and severity of spinal cord injury is crucial for predicting functional outcomes, planning rehabilitation strategies, and setting realistic expectations for recovery.