Treatment Options for Central Sleep Apnea
Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the first-line treatment for central sleep apnea (CSA), with adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) being the most effective option for most CSA subtypes except in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. 1
First-Line Treatments
Positive Airway Pressure Therapies
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)
Adaptive Servo-Ventilation (ASV)
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) with backup rate
Second-Line Treatments
Supplemental Oxygen
- Low-flow oxygen therapy is recommended for:
Pharmacological Options
- Acetazolamide
Advanced/Specialized Treatments
Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (TPNS)
- Suggested for primary CSA and CSA due to heart failure 1
- Invasive procedure that should be considered after failure of other treatments
- Limited accessibility and high cost are significant barriers 1
Treatment Algorithm Based on CSA Etiology
CSA Related to Heart Failure
- Optimize heart failure treatment first
- CPAP as initial therapy
- Low-flow oxygen if CPAP is ineffective
- ASV only in patients without reduced ejection fraction
- Consider acetazolamide as adjunctive therapy
Primary CSA
- CPAP as initial therapy
- ASV if CPAP is ineffective
- BiPAP with backup rate as alternative
- Consider acetazolamide as adjunctive therapy
- TPNS if other therapies fail
CSA Due to Medication/Substance Use (especially opioids)
- Reduce/eliminate causative medication if possible
- CPAP or BiPAP with backup rate
- ASV if initial PAP therapy fails
- Consider acetazolamide as adjunctive therapy
Treatment-Emergent CSA
- CPAP adjustment (lower pressure may help)
- ASV if CPAP adjustments fail
- BiPAP with backup rate as alternative
- Consider acetazolamide as adjunctive therapy
Monitoring and Follow-Up
- Regular follow-up is essential to assess treatment efficacy
- Persistence of central respiratory events should prompt re-evaluation of underlying risk factors 1
- Objective monitoring of PAP usage is crucial as self-reported use may be inaccurate 4
Common Pitfalls and Considerations
- Approximately 9.4% of patients with histories of congestive heart failure and ischemic heart disease may be non-responsive to all standard approaches 3
- ASV is contraindicated in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
- Treatment should focus on improving patient-reported outcomes rather than solely eliminating disordered breathing events 1
- Up to 50% of patients struggle with long-term PAP compliance, highlighting the need for early intervention for side effects 4
The treatment approach should be guided by the specific CSA subtype, underlying conditions, and patient response to therapy, with the goal of improving morbidity, mortality, and quality of life.