What is the next best diagnostic test for a patient with suspected pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dilation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Next Diagnostic Test for Suspected Pulmonary Hypertension

Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the next best diagnostic test for this 55-year-old male patient with suspected pulmonary hypertension based on echocardiographic findings of right ventricular dilation and increased RV systolic pressure. 1

Clinical Presentation Analysis

The patient presents with:

  • 2-month history of fatigue
  • Ankle swelling with 1+ pedal edema
  • Increased cardiac silhouette on CXR
  • Right axis deviation on ECG with normal sinus rhythm
  • TTE showing RV dilation with increased RV systolic pressure

These findings strongly suggest pulmonary hypertension (PH) with right ventricular strain.

Diagnostic Algorithm

Step 1: Non-invasive Testing (Already Completed)

  • Echocardiography has already shown RV dilation and increased RV systolic pressure
  • CXR has shown increased cardiac silhouette
  • ECG has shown right axis deviation

Step 2: Confirmatory Testing

RHC is required to:

  1. Confirm the presence of PH (defined as mean PAP ≥25 mmHg)
  2. Establish the specific diagnosis and classification of PH
  3. Determine the severity of PH
  4. Guide appropriate therapy 1

Evidence-Based Rationale

According to the 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension, RHC is essential to:

  • Directly measure pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP)
  • Measure pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP)
  • Calculate pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)
  • Classify PH into precapillary, isolated postcapillary, or combined pre- and postcapillary PH 1

The ESC guidelines state: "In patients with suspected PH, right-heart catheterization is required to confirm the presence of PH, establish the specific diagnosis, and determine the severity of PH." 1

Differential Considerations

CT Pulmonary Angiography

While CT pulmonary angiography is valuable for evaluating:

  • Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)
  • Pulmonary arterial anatomy
  • Parenchymal lung disease

It cannot provide the hemodynamic measurements needed to confirm and classify PH 1.

V/Q Scan

V/Q scanning is primarily useful for:

  • Ruling out CTEPH (has 96-97% sensitivity)
  • Distinguishing between different causes of PH

However, it doesn't provide the hemodynamic data needed for diagnosis and classification 1.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Skipping RHC: Relying solely on echocardiography for diagnosis of PH is insufficient as echo can be imprecise in determining actual pressures.
  2. Premature treatment: Initiating PH-specific therapy without RHC confirmation and classification can lead to inappropriate treatment.
  3. Incomplete evaluation: Failing to assess both PAP and PAWP during RHC, which are essential for proper classification of PH.

Additional Considerations

  • RHC allows for vasoreactivity testing in selected patients, which helps determine candidacy for calcium channel blocker treatment 1.
  • The morbidity and mortality rates of RHC are low (1.1% and 0.055%, respectively) when performed by experienced operators 1.
  • After confirming PH with RHC, additional testing may be needed to determine the specific etiology, including V/Q scan to rule out CTEPH or CT angiography to evaluate for surgically accessible CTEPH 1.

By proceeding with RHC, you will obtain the definitive diagnosis needed to properly classify this patient's condition and guide appropriate therapy based on the specific type of pulmonary hypertension present.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.