Risks and Management of Cervical Myelopathy
Cervical myelopathy carries significant risks of progressive neurological deterioration and permanent disability if not properly managed, with surgical intervention strongly recommended for moderate to severe cases (mJOA ≤12) to prevent irreversible spinal cord damage. 1
Clinical Risks of Cervical Myelopathy
Natural History and Progression
- The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is variable and typically follows one of these patterns:
Long-term Risks if Untreated
- Irreversible demyelination of white matter and necrosis of gray matter with prolonged severe stenosis 2
- Permanent neurological deficits affecting:
- Gait stability and mobility
- Hand dexterity and fine motor control
- Bladder and bowel function 1
- Development of spasticity and hyperreflexia 3
- Progression to quadriplegia in severe cases 3
- Significantly reduced quality of life 3
Risk Factors for Deterioration
- Age over 75 years 2
- Longer duration of symptoms before treatment 2
- More severe preoperative neurological dysfunction 2
- Presence of abnormal EMG findings or clinical radiculopathy in patients with cervical stenosis 2
- Cervical instability (significantly increases risk of neurologic deterioration after even minor trauma) 4
Diagnostic Approach
Key Clinical Findings
- Decreased hand dexterity
- Gait instability
- Hyperreflexia
- Hoffmann's sign
- Babinski sign
- Bladder/bowel dysfunction 1
Imaging
- MRI cervical spine without contrast is the preferred imaging modality
- CT myelography if MRI is contraindicated
- Key findings: severe spinal canal stenosis, T2 hyperintensity within the spinal cord (myelomalacia), multiple levels of compression 1
Management Algorithm
For Mild Myelopathy (mJOA >12)
Option 1: Surgical decompression
Option 2: Nonoperative therapy (for up to 3 years)
Important caveat: If neurological deterioration occurs during nonoperative management, immediate surgical intervention is recommended 5
For Moderate to Severe Myelopathy (mJOA ≤12)
- Surgical decompression is strongly recommended 2, 1, 5
- Benefits of surgery are maintained for at least 5-15 years postoperatively 2
- Delayed surgical intervention increases risk of permanent neurological deficits 1
Surgical Approach Selection
- Anterior approach (ACDF or ACCF): Best for focal anterior compression at limited levels 6
- Posterior approach (laminoplasty): Indicated for multilevel posterior compression with preserved cervical lordosis 6
- Laminectomy with fusion: Recommended for cases with cervical kyphosis or significant instability 6
- Combined anterior-posterior approach: May be necessary for severe deformities or multilevel involvement 6
Special Considerations
Prognostic Factors
- Preoperative sensory-evoked potentials may provide valuable prognostic information when clinical factors don't provide clear guidance 2
- Patients with cervical instability have:
- Higher incidence of neurologic deterioration after trauma
- Lower preoperative JOA scores
- Less post-surgery improvement in neurologic function 4
Non-myelopathic Patients with Cord Compression
- Without radiculopathy: Prophylactic surgery not recommended, but close clinical follow-up with education about myelopathy symptoms is advised 5
- With radiculopathy: Higher risk of developing myelopathy; consider either surgical intervention or close monitoring 5
Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Delaying diagnosis and referral to a spine surgeon when myelopathy is suspected 1, 7
- Underestimating the risk of neurological deterioration in patients with cervical instability, even with minor trauma 4
- Prolonged nonoperative management in patients with moderate to severe myelopathy 2, 1
- Failing to recognize that long periods of severe stenosis can lead to irreversible spinal cord damage 2