What tests are done to diagnose ankylosing spondylitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Tests for Ankylosing Spondylitis

The diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis requires a combination of imaging studies, laboratory tests, and clinical assessment, with radiography of the sacroiliac joints being the first-line imaging modality followed by MRI when radiographs are negative but clinical suspicion remains high. 1, 2

Imaging Studies

Radiography

  • Sacroiliac joint radiography is the first-line imaging modality 1, 2
    • Look for erosions, sclerosis, joint space narrowing, and ankylosis
    • If sacroiliitis found on radiography meets the modified New York criteria, diagnosis can be confirmed 1
    • Should be discussed with all patients who may have axial spondyloarthritis with a mature skeleton 1

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

  • Indicated when:
    • Radiographs are negative but clinical suspicion remains high
    • Modified New York criteria are not met on radiography
    • Patient has an immature skeleton 1
  • Should include:
    • T1 sequences
    • Fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive sequences (T2-weighted fat-suppressed or STIR images) 2
  • Bone marrow edema on MRI is the hallmark of active sacroiliitis 2
  • STIR sequences are generally sufficient to detect inflammation; contrast medium is not needed 1
  • Follow-up MRI can be considered when diagnosis remains uncertain 1

Other Imaging

  • Conventional radiography of the spine may be used for long-term monitoring of structural changes
  • Should not be repeated more frequently than every two years 1
  • Scintigraphy is not recommended for diagnosis 1

Laboratory Tests

HLA-B27 Testing

  • Recommended as a screening tool with:
    • High sensitivity (90-95%) in ankylosing spondylitis patients 1, 2
    • Positive likelihood ratio of 9 1, 2
    • Most useful when pre-test probability is high 2
  • A positive HLA-B27 test increases the likelihood of peripheral spondyloarthritis 1
  • HLA-B27 positivity is an ideal screening test for patients with chronic low back pain for axial SpA 1

Inflammatory Markers

  • C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement
  • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
  • Important caveat: Spondyloarthritis should not be ruled out based only on negative laboratory results from HLA-B27, CRP, or ESR testing 1
  • Both ESR and CRP have limited sensitivity (around 50%) in patients with AS 1, 3, 4
  • Neither ESR nor CRP is superior for assessing disease activity 3, 4

Clinical Assessment Tools

  • ASDAS-CRP (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score): Measures disease activity based on patient-reported outcomes and CRP levels 2
  • BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index): Measures fatigue, pain, stiffness, and discomfort 2
  • BASFI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index): Measures functional ability 2

Referral Criteria to Rheumatologist

Patients with chronic low back pain should be referred to a rheumatologist if they have:

  • Back pain occurring before age 45 that has lasted more than three months
  • At least four of the following criteria:
    • Back pain occurring before 35 years of age
    • Waking at night to alleviate symptoms
    • Buttock pain
    • Improved pain when moving or within two days of taking an NSAID
    • First-degree family member with spondyloarthritis
    • Current or previous arthritis, enthesitis, or psoriasis 1
  • Or if they have three of these criteria plus a positive HLA-B27 test 1

Common Pitfalls in Diagnosis

  • Over-reliance on radiographs alone, which may miss early disease 2
  • Ignoring inflammatory back pain patterns 2
  • Neglecting extra-articular manifestations (uveitis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease) 2
  • Misinterpreting normal inflammatory markers (ESR/CRP can be normal in up to 50% of cases) 1, 3, 4
  • Delayed diagnosis (average 7-10 years from symptom onset) 2
  • Ruling out spondyloarthritis based on a single negative test result 1

The diagnostic approach should be comprehensive, considering both clinical features and objective test results, with early referral to a rheumatologist when suspicion is high to prevent diagnostic delays that can impact quality of life and disease progression.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.