Management of Gallbladder Polyps
Cholecystectomy is strongly recommended for gallbladder polyps ≥10 mm in size due to the significant risk of malignancy. 1, 2
Size-Based Management Algorithm
Polyps ≥10 mm
- Cholecystectomy is indicated regardless of symptoms if the patient is fit for surgery
- Rationale: High risk of malignancy (up to 20.1% of surgically removed polyps may be malignant) 3
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred approach in most cases 1
Polyps 6-9 mm
- Cholecystectomy recommended if ANY risk factors are present:
- Age >60 years
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)
- Asian ethnicity
- Sessile polyp (including focal wall thickening >4 mm)
- Rapid growth (≥2 mm within follow-up period)
- Follow-up with ultrasound if no risk factors:
- At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
- Discontinue follow-up after 2 years if no growth 2
Polyps ≤5 mm
- No follow-up required if no risk factors 2
- Follow-up with ultrasound if risk factors present:
- Every 3-6 months initially 1
- Cholecystectomy recommended for PSC patients with polyps ≥8 mm 4
Special Considerations
Symptomatic Polyps
- Cholecystectomy recommended for symptomatic polyps regardless of size if:
- No alternative cause for symptoms is identified
- Patient is fit for surgery 2
- Common symptoms include right quadrant abdominal pain and epigastric pain 3
High-Risk Patients
- Lower threshold for cholecystectomy in:
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
- Consider for better characterization of polyps when standard ultrasound findings are equivocal
- Particularly useful for distinguishing true polyps from sludge 1
- For small polyps in PSC patients, contrast-enhanced ultrasound should be used; if contrast-enhancing polyp is found, cholecystectomy should be considered regardless of size 4
Follow-up Protocol
- Growth of ≥4 mm within 12 months warrants surgical consultation 1
- If polyp grows to ≥10 mm during follow-up, cholecystectomy is advised 2
- If polyp disappears during follow-up, monitoring can be discontinued 2
- Extended follow-up beyond 3 years is generally not productive 1
Pitfalls and Caveats
- Malignancy has been reported in polyps smaller than 10 mm (5% of malignant polyps were 3-5 mm, 8% were 5-10 mm) 3
- Ultrasound is the primary diagnostic tool but may have limitations in accurately measuring polyp size
- Patients with severe liver disease or decompensated cirrhosis have increased risk of complications from cholecystectomy; careful risk-benefit assessment is required 4
- Multiple small polyps (<8 mm) may spontaneously decrease in size or disappear on follow-up 4
- A cutoff of 12 mm may provide better specificity for predicting malignancy according to some studies 5
By following this evidence-based approach to gallbladder polyp management, clinicians can minimize the risk of gallbladder cancer while avoiding unnecessary surgeries in low-risk patients.