Alternative Management Options for GI Bleeding When Endoscopy is Not Available
When endoscopy is not immediately available for a patient with gastrointestinal bleeding, CT angiography (CTA) is the recommended first-line alternative for hemodynamically unstable patients with active bleeding, while medical stabilization with proton pump inhibitors and restrictive transfusion strategy should be initiated immediately. 1
Initial Stabilization Measures
Hemodynamic Stabilization:
- Implement a restrictive blood transfusion strategy with hemoglobin trigger of <70 g/L (target 70-90 g/L) for most patients
- Use a higher threshold of 80 g/L (target 100 g/L) for patients with cardiovascular disease 1
- Maintain mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg while avoiding fluid overload
- Assess and correct coagulopathy with appropriate blood products
Medication Management:
Imaging-Based Diagnostic Approaches
For Hemodynamically Unstable Patients:
CT Angiography (CTA):
- First-line imaging test for patients with brisk ongoing bleeding and hemodynamic instability 4
- High sensitivity and specificity for detecting bleeding at rates of 0.3-1.0 mL/min 1
- Can be considered if there is no in-house emergency gastroenterology coverage or the patient is not suitable for endoscopy 4
Catheter Angiography (CA):
- Should be performed if bleeding site has been localized by CTA but requires intervention 4
- Technical success rate up to 95%, with clinical success rate of 67% 4
- Allows both diagnosis and treatment through embolization
- Microcoils are the most commonly used embolic agent, with other options including gel-foam, particles, glue, and plugs 4
For Hemodynamically Stable Patients:
CT Enterography (CTE):
Video Capsule Endoscopy (VCE):
- Consider if small bowel source is suspected
- Highest diagnostic yield (87-91.9%) when performed within 48 hours of bleeding 1
Meckel Scan:
- Can be considered for unexplained intermittent GI bleeding, particularly in children and adolescents 4
Interventional Management Options
Angiographic Embolization:
- Technical success rates of 93-100%, but carries a 10-50% risk of rebleeding 1
- Recommended as a second-line treatment if endoscopic treatment is unavailable or fails
- If endoscopy visualizes but is unable to treat a source of bleeding, CA should be performed with intent to embolize 4
- In the absence of visualized contrast material extravasation but documented extravasation at CTA, prophylactic embolization of the suspected vessel should be considered 4
Surgical Intervention:
- Reserved for cases where radiological interventions fail
- No patient should proceed to emergency laparotomy without attempts to localize bleeding by radiological modalities 1
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Renal Function Considerations:
- Before catheter angiography, the patient's renal status should be optimized 4
- Consider the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy with CTA and angiography
Complications of Angiographic Intervention:
- Reported complication rates up to 10%, including access site issues, kidney damage, and non-target embolization 4
Limitations of CTA:
- May miss intermittent bleeding or slow bleeding rates below detection threshold
- Requires adequate renal function for contrast administration
Medication Management Considerations:
- For patients on anticoagulants, consider interrupting therapy at presentation
- For life-threatening hemorrhage on DOACs, consider reversal agents such as idarucizumab (for dabigatran) or andexanet (for anti-factor Xa inhibitors) 1
- For patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, aspirin should be continued without interruption, while P2Y12 receptor antagonist should be temporarily discontinued 1
By following this algorithm, clinicians can effectively manage GI bleeding when endoscopy is not immediately available, prioritizing patient stabilization while pursuing appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic interventions based on hemodynamic status and suspected bleeding source.