First-Line Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Treatment
For patients who may benefit from mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy, spironolactone at an initial dose of 25 mg once daily is the first-line MRA treatment, with dose titration to 50 mg daily after one month if tolerated. 1
Patient Populations That Benefit from MRA Therapy
MRAs are indicated for the following patient populations:
Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF):
Resistant Hypertension:
Diabetic Kidney Disease:
- Patients with type 2 diabetes, eGFR ≥25 ml/min/1.73 m², normal serum potassium, and albuminuria (ACR ≥30 mg/g) 1
Dosing and Titration Protocol
Spironolactone (First-Line MRA)
- Starting dose: 25 mg once daily 1
- Target dose: 50 mg once daily after 4 weeks if serum potassium <5.0 mEq/L 1, 2
- Dose adjustment: For patients with eGFR 31-49 mL/min/1.73 m², reduce dose by half 1
Eplerenone (Alternative MRA)
- Starting dose: 25 mg once daily 1, 2
- Target dose: 50 mg once daily after 4 weeks if serum potassium <5.0 mEq/L 2
- When to use: Consider as an alternative if spironolactone is not tolerated due to sexual side effects 3
Monitoring Protocol
Initial monitoring:
Long-term monitoring:
Discontinuation criteria:
Clinical Pearls and Caveats
- Hyperkalemia risk: Adding an MRA to ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy increases hyperkalemia risk, requiring careful monitoring 1
- Contraindications: Avoid in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² or serum potassium ≥5.0 mEq/L 1
- Combination therapy: Never combine MRAs with both ACE inhibitors and ARBs 1
- Resistant hypertension: Spironolactone is particularly effective for resistant hypertension at doses between 25-50 mg/day 3
- Medication adherence: Consider barriers to adherence such as cost and side effects when prescribing MRAs 1
Comparative Efficacy
- Spironolactone demonstrated 30% RRR in mortality in severe HF (RALES trial) 1
- Eplerenone showed 37% RRR in cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization in mild HF (EMPHASIS-HF trial) 1
- Newer non-steroidal MRAs (e.g., finerenone) are in development with potentially improved selectivity and reduced side effect profiles 4, 5
MRAs provide high economic value in patients with HFrEF and NYHA class II-IV symptoms 1, making them a cost-effective therapeutic option when clinically indicated.