What is the acceptable range for mortise widening in a displaced distal fibular fracture?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Acceptable Range for Mortise Widening in Displaced Distal Fibular Fractures

A medial clear space of less than 4 mm is considered the acceptable range for mortise widening in a displaced distal fibular fracture, confirming stability of the ankle joint. 1

Anatomical Considerations and Significance

The ankle mortise is a critical structure for ankle joint stability. When evaluating displaced distal fibular fractures, understanding the acceptable parameters for mortise widening is essential for proper treatment decisions:

  • The medial clear space measurement represents the distance between the medial malleolus and the talus
  • Widening beyond 4 mm indicates instability of the ankle joint that may require surgical intervention
  • Mortise widening directly impacts tibiotalar contact area - widening by just 1 mm can decrease tibiotalar joint contact area by 42%, potentially leading to instability and early osteoarthritis 2

Diagnostic Evaluation

Proper radiographic assessment is crucial for accurate measurement of mortise widening:

  • Standard three-view radiographic protocol should include:

    • Anteroposterior view
    • Lateral view
    • Mortise view (internal rotation view)
    • These should include visualization of the base of the fifth metatarsal 1
  • Weight-bearing radiographs provide the most valuable information for assessing stability, particularly with fractures of uncertain stability 1

  • The gravity stress view is more reliable and easier to perform than manual stress views in supination-external rotation injuries with suspected deltoid ligament disruption 1

Treatment Algorithm Based on Mortise Widening

  1. Medial clear space <4 mm: Confirms stability and may be suitable for non-operative management 1

  2. Medial clear space ≥4 mm: Indicates instability that typically requires surgical intervention

  3. Additional factors suggesting instability:

    • Medial tenderness, bruising, or swelling
    • Fibular fracture above the syndesmosis
    • Bi- or trimalleolar fractures
    • Open fracture
    • High-energy fracture injury 1

Surgical Considerations

When surgical intervention is indicated due to unacceptable mortise widening:

  • Restoration of fibular length is critical for normal ankle joint kinematics 3
  • Care must be taken with syndesmotic screw placement, as overtightening can cause paradoxical widening of the lateral clear space
  • Syndesmotic screws placed farther from the plafond (5 cm vs. 2 cm) cause less lateral clear space widening (0.34 mm/mm vs. 0.76 mm/mm) 4
  • In elderly patients with displaced distal fibular fractures, minimally invasive intramedullary nailing may be considered as an alternative to traditional ORIF 5

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Radiographic positioning: Improper positioning can lead to inaccurate assessment of mortise widening

  2. Syndesmotic overtightening: Excessive compression of the fibula toward the tibia during syndesmotic fixation can paradoxically widen the lateral clear space 4

  3. Rotational assessment: CT evaluation may be necessary in complex cases, as both supination-external rotation and pronation-external rotation fractures typically result in external rotation of the distal fibular fragment 6

  4. Age considerations: While age 65 is often used as a threshold for surgical decision-making in fracture care, functional demand should be the primary consideration rather than chronological age 1

  5. Follow-up imaging: Regular radiographic evaluation is essential to ensure proper alignment during healing, though evidence suggests that reducing the frequency of follow-up radiographs may not negatively impact outcomes 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.