Should you use 2 types of obstetric (obstetric) vacuums for delivery?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Using Multiple Obstetric Vacuum Extractors for Delivery is Not Recommended

Using two types of obstetric vacuum extractors for delivery is strongly contraindicated due to the significant risk of fetal injury, including intracranial and subgaleal hemorrhage. 1, 2

Risks of Vacuum Extraction in Delivery

Vacuum extraction already carries inherent risks when used appropriately for vaginal delivery:

  • Neonatal complications:

    • Subgaleal hemorrhage (most significant risk) 2
    • Intracranial hemorrhage 1, 2
    • Cephalohematoma and caput succedaneum 2, 3
    • Scalp injuries 3, 4
  • Maternal complications:

    • Postpartum hemorrhage 2
    • Higher degrees of perineal tears 2

Vacuum Use During Cesarean Delivery

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists explicitly warns against using vacuum extraction during cesarean delivery 1, 2. The 2024 guidelines on management of impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery specifically state:

  • "The use of a vacuum at CD has the potential to cause significant fetal injury, such as intracranial and subgaleal hemorrhage" 1
  • "A single forceps blade or ventouse, employed abdominally to assist delivery of an impacted fetal head at CD, is not recommended" 1

Vacuum Types and Their Appropriate Use

Different vacuum extractor types have different profiles:

  • Rigid/metal cups:

    • More effective at achieving vaginal birth 4
    • Associated with higher rates of neonatal scalp trauma 3, 4
    • Lower detachment rates than soft cups 3
  • Soft cups:

    • Cause fewer cosmetic effects and scalp lacerations 3
    • Higher failure rates than metal cups 4
    • Do not reduce incidence of cephalohematomas or subgaleal hemorrhage 3
  • Hand-held vacuum:

    • More failures than metal vacuum 4
    • Slightly fewer failures than soft vacuum 4

Best Practice Recommendations

  1. Choose a single appropriate vacuum device based on the clinical situation rather than using multiple types sequentially 1, 2, 3

  2. Limit vacuum duration and avoid multiple cup detachments to reduce the risk of subgaleal hemorrhage 2

  3. Consider alternatives when vacuum extraction fails:

    • If vacuum extraction fails, consider forceps or cesarean delivery rather than trying a second vacuum device 4, 5
    • Failed vacuum extraction followed by forceps (sequential instruments) carries additional risks 5
  4. Ensure proper training:

    • Vacuum extraction should only be performed by properly trained clinicians who understand the risks and proper technique 2
    • Simulation training is recommended for difficult deliveries 1

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not attempt to use vacuum before complete cervical dilation as this is associated with higher failure rates 3
  • Avoid incorrect cup application which can lead to detachment and failed extraction 3
  • Do not persist with vacuum extraction when signs of difficulty are present (multiple detachments, lack of descent) 2, 3
  • Never use vacuum extraction for cesarean delivery due to the high risk of fetal injury 1, 2

In conclusion, the evidence strongly supports using a single appropriate vacuum device when indicated for vaginal delivery, and completely avoiding vacuum use during cesarean delivery. Using multiple vacuum devices sequentially increases the risk of trauma without clear benefit.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Vacuum-Assisted Vaginal Birth Complications

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Vacuum-assisted delivery.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2002

Research

Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.