Is Polydioxanone (PDS) more long-lasting than Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Comparison of PDS and Vicryl Longevity

PDS (polydioxanone) is significantly more long-lasting than Vicryl (polyglactin 910), with PDS retaining 25% of its tensile strength at 42 days and taking 130-180 days for complete absorption, while Vicryl has a half-life tensile strength of only 2 weeks. 1, 2

Structural Differences

  • PDS:

    • Monofilament structure
    • Lower inflammatory response
    • Slower hydrolysis rate
    • Complete absorption in 130-180 days
  • Vicryl:

    • Braided multifilament structure
    • Higher tissue inflammatory reaction
    • Faster hydrolysis rate
    • Mostly absorbed after several weeks

Tensile Strength Comparison

Research directly comparing these sutures shows significant differences in their longevity:

  • PDS has a half-life tensile strength of 6 weeks 2
  • Vicryl has a half-life tensile strength of only 2 weeks 2
  • While Vicryl initially has high tensile strength comparable to non-absorbable sutures, it degrades much more rapidly than PDS 3

Clinical Implications

The longer-lasting nature of PDS makes it particularly suitable for:

  • Tissues that require extended healing support
  • Situations where wound dehiscence is a concern
  • Applications where prolonged tensile strength is needed

However, it's important to note that PDS is initially less tractable than Vicryl, though this difference becomes insignificant after approximately 11 days of implantation 4.

Inflammatory Response

PDS and other monofilament sutures elicit a lower degree of chronic inflammation compared to Vicryl and other braided sutures 5. This is particularly important in:

  • Sensitive tissues
  • Patients prone to excessive inflammatory responses
  • Areas where scarring needs to be minimized

Infection Risk

The monofilament structure of PDS causes less bacterial seeding and may be associated with lower infection risk compared to braided sutures like Vicryl 6. This makes PDS potentially advantageous in:

  • Contaminated wounds
  • Immunocompromised patients
  • Areas prone to infection

Practical Considerations

When using PDS:

  • Ensure adequate knot security (may require additional knots)
  • Avoid excessive tension to prevent tissue necrosis
  • Consider the longer absorption time in your follow-up planning

Caveat

While PDS offers longer-lasting support, this isn't always necessary or beneficial for all tissues. For tissues that heal quickly or where prolonged suture presence might cause complications, the shorter-lasting Vicryl might be more appropriate.

References

Research

PDS (polydioxanone suture): a new synthetic absorbable suture in cataract surgery. A preliminary study.

Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde, 1981

Research

In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 1988

Research

Experiences with polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in general surgery.

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica, 1977

Guideline

Suture Materials and Techniques

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.