Is the free androgen index (FAI) in men inaccurate?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Free Androgen Index in Men Is Inaccurate and Should Not Be Used

The free androgen index (FAI) is not valid for adult males and should not be used for assessing androgen status in men. 1 Instead, calculated free testosterone (cFT) using validated equations or direct measurement methods like equilibrium dialysis should be employed when evaluating testosterone status in men.

Why FAI Is Problematic in Men

The fundamental issue with FAI in men stems from its mathematical derivation:

  • FAI is calculated as (total testosterone/SHBG) × 100
  • This calculation assumes that SHBG binding capacity greatly exceeds testosterone concentration 1
  • This assumption is valid in women but not in men, where testosterone levels are much higher
  • In men, SHBG binding sites can become saturated with testosterone, invalidating the FAI formula

Studies have demonstrated this inaccuracy:

  • Correlation between FAI and directly measured free testosterone is poor in men (r = 0.435) compared to women (r = 0.858) 1
  • FAI particularly overestimates free testosterone when SHBG concentrations are low 2

Recommended Alternatives for Men

When assessing androgen status in men, especially those with symptoms of hypogonadism, the following approach is recommended:

  1. First-line measurement: Morning serum total testosterone using an accurate and reliable assay 3

  2. For borderline total testosterone results: Determine free testosterone using one of these methods (in order of preference):

    • Equilibrium dialysis (gold standard but limited availability) 3
    • Ammonium sulfate precipitation 3
    • Calculated free testosterone (cFT) using validated equations (Vermeulen, Sodergard, or Ly-Handelsman) 4
  3. Additional testing: If hypogonadism is confirmed, measure luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to determine if it's primary (testicular) or central (hypothalamic-pituitary) 3

Evidence-Based Reference Ranges

Reference intervals from high-quality studies:

  • Total testosterone: 9.4-31.0 nmol/L
  • Calculated free testosterone (Vermeulen equation): 0.245-0.785 nmol/L 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never rely on direct free testosterone immunoassays: These "analog" methods available at most local laboratories yield unreliable results 3, 5
  • Avoid using FAI in men: Despite its continued use in some settings, FAI is mathematically invalid for men 1
  • Consider timing of blood draw: Testosterone levels should be measured in the morning when levels are highest
  • Account for SHBG variations: SHBG can be affected by age, obesity, diabetes, liver disease, and medications, potentially affecting interpretation of total testosterone 3
  • Confirm low results: A total testosterone level below the lower limit of normal should be confirmed by repeat testing due to assay variability 3

Special Considerations

For men with suspected alterations in binding proteins (obesity, liver disease, etc.), free testosterone assessment becomes particularly important, as total testosterone alone may not accurately reflect androgen status. In these cases, calculated free testosterone using validated equations provides a more reliable assessment than FAI 5, 4.

References

Research

The free androgen index is not valid for adult males.

The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 1993

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Reflections concerning biochemical parameters of androgenicity.

The aging male : the official journal of the International Society for the Study of the Aging Male, 2004

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.