What is the Sudan test?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sudan Test: A Diagnostic Test for Fat Detection in Stool Samples

The Sudan test is a staining method used to detect and identify fat in stool samples, primarily to evaluate for steatorrhea (excess fat in feces) by staining lipids with Sudan dyes.

Test Principles and Methodology

The Sudan test works through the following mechanism:

  • Uses lipid-soluble dyes (Sudan III or Sudan IV) that selectively stain fat droplets in stool samples
  • Can be performed as either a "neutral fat" or "split fat" stain:
    • Neutral fat stain: Without acidification or heating, identifies primarily triglycerides 1
    • Split fat stain: With acidification and heating, identifies both triglycerides and fatty acids 1

Clinical Applications

The primary clinical applications include:

  1. Screening for steatorrhea: Used as a qualitative or semi-quantitative screening test for fat malabsorption
  2. Evaluation of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI): Though not specific for EPI, can detect increased fecal fat 2
  3. Differentiation of fat types in stool:
    • Can distinguish between triglycerides and fatty acids
    • Helps identify fatty acid soaps after acidification 1

Limitations and Considerations

Despite its widespread use, the Sudan test has important limitations:

  • Limited specificity: The test is nonspecific for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency 2
  • Qualitative nature: Traditional Sudan staining provides qualitative rather than quantitative results 3
  • Cannot detect all lipid types: Neither neutral fat nor split fat stain can detect phospholipids or cholesteryl esters 1
  • Variable accuracy: Sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 69% compared to the Van de Kamer method (quantitative fat measurement) 4

Improved Methodology

A quantitative approach to Sudan staining has been developed:

  • Involves counting and measuring the size of fat globules
  • Shows improved correlation with chemically measured fecal fat output
  • Demonstrates better sensitivity (94%) and specificity (95%) compared to traditional qualitative methods 3

Alternative and Complementary Tests

For more definitive evaluation of fat malabsorption, consider:

  • Fecal elastase-1 (FE-1): Most commonly used indirect pancreatic function test for diagnosing EPI 2

    • FE-1 <200 mg/g of stool is considered abnormal
    • FE-1 <100 mg/g more consistent with EPI
    • FE-1 <50 mg/g most reliable for severe EPI
  • Quantitative fecal fat measurement: The gold standard for documenting steatorrhea, though rarely needed and impractical for routine clinical use 2

Clinical Pearls

  • The 72-hour fecal fat determination measures total fatty acid content after saponification but doesn't differentiate between primary sources of the measured fatty acids 1
  • Contrary to traditional belief, patients with pancreatic insufficiency do not excrete excessive amounts of triglycerides but rather show increased fatty acid content 5
  • Exogenous pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) does not alter fecal elastase-1 test results 2
  • For detecting lipofuscin (age pigment) in tissues, Sudan Black B staining can also be used 6

The Sudan test remains a useful screening tool for fat malabsorption, but more specific tests like fecal elastase-1 are recommended for diagnosing exocrine pancreatic insufficiency 2.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Lipofuscin Accumulation in Myocytes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.