Would an MRI be useful in evaluating new onset pain in a patient with a history of femur shortening 20 years later?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

MRI is Useful for Evaluating New Onset Pain in a Patient with History of Femur Shortening

MRI without IV contrast is the most appropriate imaging modality for evaluating new onset pain in a patient with a history of femur shortening from 20 years ago. 1

Rationale for MRI

When evaluating a patient with new onset pain in the context of previous femur shortening, MRI offers several advantages:

  1. Superior soft tissue evaluation: MRI is highly sensitive and specific for detecting many abnormalities involving both osseous structures and surrounding soft tissues 1

  2. Detection of potential complications: MRI can identify:

    • Bone marrow lesions (BMLs), which are associated with increased pain 1
    • Stress fractures or insufficiency fractures that may be radiographically occult 1
    • Soft tissue abnormalities such as tendinopathy, bursitis, or muscle injuries 1
    • Early signs of osteoarthritis that may develop following femoral shortening 2
  3. Comprehensive assessment: MRI can evaluate both intra-articular and extra-articular causes of pain, which is crucial in post-surgical patients 1

Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Initial radiographs: Start with AP pelvis and lateral femoral head-neck radiographs to assess for obvious structural abnormalities or hardware complications 1, 3

  2. If radiographs are negative or equivocal: Proceed to MRI without IV contrast of the affected hip/femur 1

    • This follows the ACR Appropriateness Criteria recommendation that "MRI hip without IV contrast is appropriate in patients with chronic hip pain when radiographs are negative, equivocal, or nondiagnostic" 1
  3. If MRI is contraindicated: Consider CT without contrast as an alternative, though it has lower sensitivity for soft tissue abnormalities 1

Potential Pathologies to Consider

The new onset pain 20 years after femur shortening could be related to several conditions that MRI is well-suited to detect:

Mechanical/Structural Issues

  • Altered biomechanics: Femoral shortening can lead to changes in the mechanical axis of the limb, potentially causing lateral deviation and altered knee alignment 2
  • Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): Changes in femoral geometry may lead to impingement, which MRI can effectively evaluate 3, 4
  • Stress fractures: Altered biomechanics may lead to stress injuries that are often radiographically occult initially 1

Soft Tissue Pathology

  • Tendinopathy or bursitis: Common in patients with altered biomechanics 1
  • Muscle imbalance or compensation injuries: MRI can detect muscle atrophy or hypertrophy related to compensatory mechanisms 1

Degenerative Changes

  • Early osteoarthritis: Femoral shortening may accelerate degenerative changes due to altered joint mechanics 2
  • Bone marrow lesions: Associated with pain and early degenerative changes 1

Clinical Implications

The findings on MRI will guide treatment decisions:

  • Conservative management: For soft tissue injuries, early osteoarthritis, or mild stress reactions
  • Surgical intervention: For significant structural abnormalities, advanced osteoarthritis, or unstable stress fractures
  • Pain management strategies: Targeted based on specific pathology identified

Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Incidental findings: MRI may reveal asymptomatic abnormalities that are not the source of pain. Correlation with clinical examination is essential 3

  2. Hardware artifacts: If the patient has retained hardware from the shortening procedure, metal artifact reduction sequences may be necessary 1

  3. Referred pain: Consider that hip pain may be referred from the lumbar spine or knee. If hip MRI is negative, imaging of these regions may be warranted 1

  4. Delayed complications: Femoral shortening can lead to long-term biomechanical changes affecting the entire limb. A comprehensive evaluation should consider the hip, knee, and even ankle joints if clinically indicated 2

By following this approach, clinicians can effectively evaluate new onset pain in patients with a history of femur shortening, potentially identifying treatable causes and preventing further complications.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.