Flecainide and Diltiazem Belong to Different Antiarrhythmic Drug Classes
No, flecainide and diltiazem are not in the same class of medications. Flecainide is a Class IC antiarrhythmic drug, while diltiazem is a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker.
Classification and Mechanisms of Action
Flecainide
- Class: Class IC antiarrhythmic agent 1
- Mechanism: Blocks sodium channels, producing a dose-related decrease in intracardiac conduction in all parts of the heart with greatest effect on the His-Purkinje system 1
- Electrophysiologic effects: Decreases conduction velocity, particularly in the ventricles, with less pronounced effects on AV nodal conduction 1, 2
- Pharmacology: Local anesthetic activity with membrane stabilizing properties 3
Diltiazem
- Class: Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (benzothiazepine class) 4
- Mechanism: Blocks L-type calcium channels 4
- Electrophysiologic effects: Slows AV nodal conduction, prolongs AV nodal refractory period 5
- Pharmacology: Vasodilator with negative chronotropic and dromotropic effects 4
Clinical Applications
Flecainide
- Indicated for:
Diltiazem
- Indicated for:
Important Contraindications and Precautions
Flecainide
- Contraindicated in:
Diltiazem
- Contraindicated in:
Drug Interactions
Flecainide
- Interacts with verapamil, digoxin, and other drugs with SA/AV nodal-blocking properties 5
Diltiazem
- Is a substrate of CYP3A4 and a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor 5
- Interacts with numerous medications including apixaban, cyclosporine, everolimus, and flecainide 5
Clinical Implications of Different Classifications
Understanding that these medications belong to different classes is crucial for clinical decision-making:
- They have different safety profiles in various patient populations
- Their contraindications differ significantly
- They may be used in combination for certain arrhythmias, leveraging their different mechanisms
- Drug selection should be based on the specific arrhythmia mechanism and patient characteristics
The 2019 ESC guidelines have downgraded recommendations for both drugs in certain scenarios, but they remain important options in the management of various arrhythmias when used appropriately 5.