What ECG changes should not be overlooked?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Critical ECG Changes That Should Not Be Overlooked

ECG changes that should not be overlooked include ST-segment elevation/depression, T-wave abnormalities, pathological Q waves, posterior and right ventricular infarction patterns, and left main coronary obstruction patterns, as these findings can indicate life-threatening conditions requiring immediate intervention. 1

ST-Segment Abnormalities

ST-Segment Elevation

  • New ST elevation at the J point in two contiguous leads with specific cut-points:

    • ≥0.1 mV in all leads except V2-V3
    • ≥0.2 mV in men ≥40 years in V2-V3
    • ≥0.25 mV in men <40 years in V2-V3
    • ≥0.15 mV in women in V2-V3 2
  • Prolonged ST elevation (>20 min), particularly when associated with reciprocal ST depression, should always be considered significant, even in patients with initially non-diagnostic ECGs 1

ST-Segment Depression

  • New horizontal or down-sloping ST depression ≥0.05 mV in two contiguous leads 2
  • ST depression in leads V1-V3 may indicate posterior wall MI (inferobasal), especially when the terminal T wave is positive (ST elevation equivalent) 1

T-Wave Abnormalities

  • T-wave inversion ≥0.1 mV in two contiguous leads with prominent R wave or R/S ratio >1 2
  • Hyperacute T waves (tall, peaked T waves) in the early phase of myocardial infarction 2, 3
  • Pseudo-normalization of previously inverted T waves during chest pain may indicate acute myocardial ischemia 1, 2
  • T-wave inversion in lead aVL as an early sign of inferior wall ischemia 3

Q Wave Abnormalities

  • Any Q wave in leads V2-V3 ≥0.02 sec or QS complex 2
  • Q wave ≥0.03 sec and ≥0.1 mV deep or QS complex in leads I, II, aVL, aVF, or V1-V6 in any two contiguous leads 2
  • Distortion of the terminal portion of the QRS complex, which is independently associated with higher hospital mortality in STEMI patients 4

Easily Missed Infarction Patterns

Posterior Myocardial Infarction

  • ST depression in leads V1-V3 with upright (positive) terminal T waves 1
  • Requires posterior leads (V7-V9) for direct visualization
  • Cut-point of 0.05 mV ST elevation in V7-V9 (0.1 mV in men <40 years) 1, 2

Right Ventricular Infarction

  • Often accompanies inferior MI
  • Requires right-sided leads (V3R, V4R)
  • ST elevation ≥0.05 mV in V3R/V4R (≥0.1 mV in men <30 years) 1, 2

Left Main Coronary Obstruction

  • ST depression >0.1 mV in eight or more surface leads
  • ST elevation in aVR and/or V1
  • Often associated with hemodynamic compromise 1

Special Considerations

Bundle Branch Blocks

  • Diagnosis of MI is more difficult with LBBB
  • Look for concordant ST-segment elevation or comparison with previous ECG 1, 2
  • In RBBB, new ST elevation or Q waves should raise suspicion for myocardial ischemia or infarction 1

Dynamic Changes

  • Serial ECGs at 15-30 minute intervals in symptomatic patients with initially non-diagnostic ECGs 1, 2
  • Multiple ECGs may be needed during evolving ischemia 1
  • Compare with prior ECGs when available 1, 2

Other Conditions That May Mimic Ischemia

  • Acute pericarditis: diffuse ST elevation with PR depression
  • Stress-induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy: ST-T changes disproportionate to cardiac biomarkers 1
  • Early repolarization, LV hypertrophy, and conduction delays can cause ST-T abnormalities 1

Prognostic Implications

  • More profound ST-segment shift or T-wave inversion involving multiple leads/territories indicates greater myocardial ischemia and worse prognosis 1, 2
  • The amount of ST deviation correlates with time to thrombolysis, with larger deviations leading to faster treatment 5
  • ST depression on presenting ECG portends highest risk of death at 6 months 2

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying on a single ECG when the condition is evolving; obtain serial ECGs 1, 6
  • Overlooking posterior MI by not using posterior leads (V7-V9) when indicated 1
  • Missing right ventricular involvement by not recording right precordial leads (V3R, V4R) in inferior MI 1
  • Assuming a normal ECG excludes ACS (1-6% of patients with normal ECG later proven to have MI) 2
  • Failing to compare with previous ECGs when available 1, 2
  • Overlooking subtle early signs of ischemia like T-wave inversion in aVL, terminal QRS distortion, or hyperacute T-waves 3

Remember that ECG changes should be interpreted in the clinical context, and when in doubt, serial ECGs and cardiac biomarkers should be obtained to aid in diagnosis.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Myocardial Infarction Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.