What percentage of Polycythemia Vera (PV) patients are JAK2 (Janus Kinase 2) negative?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

JAK2 Negativity in Polycythemia Vera

Polycythemia vera (PV) is JAK2 negative in only approximately 3-5% of cases, with virtually all patients having some form of JAK2 mutation. 1

Molecular Profile of PV

JAK2 Mutation Status

  • JAK2 V617F mutation is present in >95% of PV cases 1, 2
  • In JAK2 V617F-negative PV cases (3-5%), most harbor JAK2 exon 12 mutations 3
  • Specifically, 2-4% of PV patients have JAK2 exon 12 mutations 1
  • After accounting for misdiagnosis and treatment effects, >95% of PV patients have some form of JAK2 mutation 3

JAK2 Exon 12 Mutations

  • In a European collaborative study of 106 JAK2 V617F-negative PV patients, 17 different exon 12 mutations were identified 4
  • Common exon 12 mutations include F537-K539delinsL and N542-E543del 3
  • These mutations are functionally similar to the JAK2 V617F mutation but result in a somewhat different clinical presentation 5

Clinical Differences Between JAK2 V617F and Exon 12 Mutations

JAK2 Exon 12-Positive PV

  • Two-thirds of patients present with isolated erythrocytosis 4
  • Significantly higher hemoglobin levels at diagnosis 4
  • Lower platelet and leukocyte counts at diagnosis 4
  • Bone marrow shows hypercellularity with erythroid hyperplasia 5
  • Megakaryocytes are typically small and atypical, with abnormal lobation and chromatin distribution 5
  • Rare clusters of megakaryocytes may be present but are usually subtle 5

JAK2 V617F-Positive PV

  • More likely to present with panmyelosis (elevated red cells, white cells, and platelets) 4
  • More pronounced megakaryocytic abnormalities 5
  • Classic myeloproliferative morphologic features are more evident 5

Diagnostic Implications

  • World Health Organization (WHO) criteria include JAK2 mutations (both V617F and exon 12) as major diagnostic criteria for PV 2
  • The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends testing for JAK2 V617F mutation first, and if negative, testing for JAK2 exon 12 mutations in patients suspected of having PV 2
  • Clinically suspected PV with low serum erythropoietin and absent JAK2 V617F should prompt evaluation for exon 12 mutations 5

Prognostic Implications

Despite phenotypic differences, long-term outcomes appear similar between JAK2 V617F and exon 12 mutation carriers:

  • Similar incidences of thrombosis, progression to myelofibrosis, leukemic transformation, and death 4
  • Age >60 years and prior thrombosis remain the main predictors of thrombotic events in both groups 4

Clinical Approach to JAK2-Negative Erythrocytosis

When faced with suspected PV that is JAK2 V617F negative:

  1. Test for JAK2 exon 12 mutations
  2. If exon 12 mutations are negative, reconsider the diagnosis
  3. Evaluate for other causes of erythrocytosis (congenital, secondary causes)
  4. Consider bone marrow examination for morphologic assessment

Management Considerations

Management remains the same regardless of mutation type:

  • Phlebotomy to maintain hematocrit <45%
  • Low-dose aspirin (81-100 mg/day)
  • Cytoreductive therapy for high-risk patients (age >60 years or history of thrombosis)

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • JAK2 exon 12-positive PV may be misdiagnosed as idiopathic erythrocytosis due to the isolated erythrocytosis and subtle bone marrow findings 5
  • Testing peripheral blood for exon 12 mutations is reliable and can avoid the need for bone marrow examination in some cases 3
  • The presence of erythroid hyperplasia with subtle megakaryocytic atypia should raise suspicion for exon 12 mutations even when classic myeloproliferative features are absent 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.