What score on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 warrants intervention?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

PHQ-9 Score Thresholds for Clinical Intervention

A PHQ-9 score of 8 or higher warrants clinical intervention, with the specific intervention intensity determined by the severity category of the score. 1, 2

PHQ-9 Scoring and Intervention Algorithm

Initial Screening Process

  1. Begin with PHQ-2 (first two questions of PHQ-9)
    • If either item scores 2 or higher ("more than half the days" or "nearly every day"), proceed to full PHQ-9 1, 2
    • If both items score 0-1, no further screening needed 1

PHQ-9 Score Interpretation and Recommended Interventions

Score Range Severity Category Recommended Intervention
1-7 None/Mild No intervention required; patient likely has effective coping skills [1]
8-14 Moderate Seek consultation with psychology/psychiatry; consider low-intensity interventions [1,2]
15-19 Moderately Severe Referral to psychology/psychiatry for diagnosis and treatment; high-intensity interventions [1,2]
20-27 Severe Urgent referral for psychiatric evaluation; high-intensity interventions [1,2]

Special Considerations

Self-Harm Risk Assessment

  • Item 9 on PHQ-9 assesses thoughts of self-harm
  • Never omit this question as it may artificially lower the score and miss critical safety concerns 1, 2
  • Any positive response to item 9 requires immediate risk assessment regardless of total score 2
  • For patients at risk of harm to self/others: refer for emergency evaluation, facilitate safe environment, and initiate one-to-one observation 1

Evidence Quality and Clinical Context

  • The traditional cutoff for PHQ-9 is 10, but the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends a cutoff of 8 based on studies with cancer outpatients 1
  • The PHQ-9 has demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability and strong validity as both a diagnostic and severity measure 3
  • A 5-point change on the PHQ-9 represents the minimal clinically important difference for individual patients 3

Intervention Types Based on Severity

  • Low-intensity interventions (for moderate symptoms):

    • Guided self-help based on cognitive behavioral therapy
    • Group-based CBT
    • Structured physical activity program
    • Pharmacologic treatment as appropriate 1
  • High-intensity interventions (for moderately severe to severe symptoms):

    • Individual psychological therapy with licensed mental health professionals
    • Pharmacologic treatment
    • Relapse prevention strategies 1

Monitoring and Follow-up

  • Schedule follow-up within 2 weeks of initiating treatment 2
  • Continue regular monitoring on a monthly basis using PHQ-9 2
  • Target a 50% reduction in PHQ-9 score or achievement of score <5 (remission) 2
  • Research shows PHQ-9 is often underutilized for monitoring treatment response, despite its value in measurement-based care 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Underutilization of PHQ-9 for ongoing monitoring during treatment 4
  • Omitting the self-harm question (item 9) 1, 2
  • Relying solely on clinical impression rather than validated measures 2
  • Inconsistent follow-up that fails to track treatment response 2, 4

The PHQ-9 has proven to be a responsive, reliable, and valid measure for both diagnosing depression and monitoring treatment outcomes, making it an excellent tool for clinical decision-making 5, 6, 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Depression Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Journal of general internal medicine, 2001

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.