SLUMS Mental Test Score for Driving Safety
For patients with cognitive impairment, a SLUMS score of 18 or higher is generally considered acceptable for driving safety. 1
Understanding Cognitive Assessment Tools for Driving Evaluation
The Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) examination is a 30-point cognitive screening tool developed primarily for use in VA populations. It is well-suited for detecting both mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia, and can track progression through moderate stages of dementia 2.
Key Cognitive Assessment Tools for Driving Evaluation:
- SLUMS: 7-10 minutes to administer, range 0-30 points 2
- MMSE: 7-10 minutes to administer, range 0-30 points, less sensitive for MCI 3
- MoCA: 10-15 minutes to administer, better sensitivity for detecting MCI 3
Evidence-Based Approach to Cognitive Assessment for Driving
Research shows that cognitive screening measures have different predictive values for driving safety depending on whether the patient has a pre-established diagnosis of cognitive impairment:
- For individuals with diagnosed cognitive impairment, the MoCA has shown significant relationship with on-road driving test outcomes, with each 1-point decrease in MoCA score increasing the likelihood of failing a road test by 1.36 times 1
- A MoCA score of 18 or less should raise concerns about driving safety in those with cognitive impairment 1
- The MMSE alone has poor predictive validity for on-road performance in community-dwelling older drivers 4
- The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R) has shown higher classification accuracy than MMSE for detecting unsafe drivers 5
Clinical Algorithm for Assessing Driving Safety Using SLUMS
- Administer the SLUMS test (available at: http://aging.slu.edu/pdfsurveys/mentalstatus.pdf) 2
- Interpret results based on cognitive status:
- If patient has diagnosed cognitive impairment:
- Score ≥18: Likely acceptable for driving
- Score <18: High risk for unsafe driving, consider formal driving evaluation
- If patient has no diagnosed cognitive impairment:
- SLUMS alone is insufficient to determine driving safety
- Consider additional assessment tools and on-road evaluation
- If patient has diagnosed cognitive impairment:
Important Considerations and Pitfalls
- Don't rely on cognitive tests alone: Combining cognitive tests with informant reports on changes in cognition, function, and behavior increases diagnostic accuracy 3
- Education level matters: False positives are more common in older adults with lower education levels 3
- Serial assessments are valuable: Perform follow-up cognitive assessments every 6-12 months using the same version of cognitive tests to track changes over time 3
- Visuospatial and executive functions: These domains, which are incorporated in the SLUMS but not in the MMSE, have incremental value in predicting driving ability 5
Additional Recommendations
- Document baseline cognitive status to help anticipate problems with treatment adherence and to help families plan for future care needs 3
- For patients with borderline scores, consider referral for a comprehensive driving evaluation with an occupational therapist specialized in driving assessment
- Discuss the results and implications with both the patient and family members to ensure safety and appropriate planning
By following this evidence-based approach using the SLUMS examination, clinicians can better identify patients at risk for unsafe driving while allowing those with adequate cognitive function to maintain their independence and mobility.