What is the recommended anesthesia plan for an 82-year-old lady with a history of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) with Rapid Ventricular Response (RVR), anticoagulation, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Hypertension (HTN), Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), spinal stenosis, Osteoarthritis (OA), and hypothyroidism undergoing revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Anesthesia Plan for 82-Year-Old Patient Undergoing TKA Revision

Recommendation Summary

Neuraxial anesthesia (spinal) with arterial line monitoring is the preferred approach for this high-risk elderly patient with complex cardiac comorbidities undergoing TKA revision surgery.

Patient Risk Assessment

This 82-year-old female presents with:

  • Complex cardiac history: AF with RVR requiring high-dose bisoprolol and verapamil
  • Previous ICU admissions after initial TKA for AF with RVR and fluid management issues
  • Cardiac abnormalities: mitral annular calcification, mild MR, moderate TR, mild pHTN, reduced EF
  • Multiple comorbidities: T2DM, GERD, HTN, OSA (non-compliant with CPAP), spinal stenosis, OA, hypothyroidism
  • Anticoagulation for AF (currently held preoperatively)

Anesthesia Plan

1. Anesthetic Technique

  • Primary technique: Spinal anesthesia (SAB) with adductor canal block (ACB)
    • Rationale: Neuraxial anesthesia is associated with better outcomes for TKA including fewer thromboembolic events, lower transfusion requirements, fewer respiratory complications, and reduced hospital length of stay 1
    • Previous successful SAB with ACB for initial TKA surgery

2. Monitoring

  • Standard ASA monitors
  • Arterial line for continuous blood pressure monitoring and blood sampling
  • Consider central venous access if significant fluid shifts anticipated
  • Continuous pulse oximetry during recovery period

3. Perioperative Anticoagulation Management

  • Continue to hold anticoagulation preoperatively
  • Follow institutional protocol for timing of postoperative anticoagulation resumption
  • Consider bridging therapy based on CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (likely high in this patient) 1
  • Apixaban would be preferred when restarting anticoagulation due to lower renal clearance (27%) compared to rivaroxaban (33%) 2

4. Cardiac Management

  • Continue bisoprolol and verapamil on the day of surgery to maintain rate control
  • Have antiarrhythmic medications readily available (diltiazem, metoprolol IV)
  • Metoprolol is preferred if breakthrough AF with RVR occurs during surgery 3
  • Avoid fluid overload given history of heart failure and previous overdiuresis

5. OSA Management

  • Consider CPAP in the immediate postoperative period despite previous non-compliance
  • Position patient in lateral, semi-upright, or non-supine position during recovery 1
  • Continuous pulse oximetry monitoring postoperatively
  • Minimize opioid use to prevent respiratory depression

6. Postoperative Pain Management

  • Multimodal analgesia to minimize opioid requirements:
    • Continue ACB with catheter for 48-72 hours
    • Scheduled acetaminophen and NSAIDs if not contraindicated
    • Low-dose opioids as rescue only
    • Consider gabapentinoids if appropriate

7. Contingency Plan

  • If spinal anesthesia fails or is contraindicated:
    • General anesthesia with secure airway (ETT preferred over LMA)
    • Full reversal of neuromuscular blockade before extubation
    • Extubate when fully awake in semi-upright position

Rationale for Neuraxial Technique

  1. Evidence-based benefit: The 2019 International Consensus on Anaesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery (ICAROS) guidelines recommend neuraxial anesthesia for TKA based on systematic review and meta-analysis 1

  2. Cardiac stability: Avoids hemodynamic fluctuations associated with general anesthesia induction/emergence in a patient with cardiac disease

  3. Previous success: Patient had uneventful intraoperative course with SAB during initial TKA

  4. Reduced complications: Lower risk of thromboembolic events, which is particularly important given the patient's AF and need for anticoagulation 1

  5. OSA management: Avoids airway manipulation and reduces postoperative opioid requirements in a patient with untreated OSA 1

Potential Challenges and Mitigations

  1. Duration of surgery: For a 2.5-hour case, consider:

    • Higher dose/concentration of local anesthetic in spinal
    • Have low-dose sedation available if needed for patient comfort
    • Be prepared to convert to GA if spinal duration insufficient
  2. Hemodynamic instability:

    • Arterial line for beat-to-beat monitoring
    • Careful fluid management given cardiac history
    • Vasopressors readily available for hypotension
    • Avoid rapid position changes
  3. Anticoagulation resumption:

    • Coordinate with surgical team for optimal timing
    • Balance risk of bleeding vs. thromboembolism
    • Consider bridging with LMWH if high stroke risk 1
  4. Breakthrough AF with RVR:

    • Have IV beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers immediately available
    • Consider preemptive administration of oral medications

This anesthesia plan prioritizes the patient's cardiac stability while providing optimal surgical conditions and postoperative pain control, with careful consideration of her multiple comorbidities.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients with Renal Impairment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.