Best Device for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
For ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), validated oscillometric devices that have undergone independent validation according to recognized standards (AAMI or BHS) are the best choice, with specific preference for devices that provide comprehensive 24-hour data with minimal patient discomfort.
Device Selection Criteria
When selecting an ABPM device, healthcare providers should consider:
Validation status:
- Only use devices that have been independently validated according to Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) or British Hypertension Society (BHS) standards 1
- A comprehensive list of validated monitors is available at www.dableducational.org 1
Technical specifications:
Patient comfort and compliance:
Specific Device Recommendations
Based on the available evidence, the following devices have demonstrated good performance:
- Spacelabs 90217A: Validated device with good accuracy in both static and ambulatory conditions 4
- Mobil-O-Graph NG: Validated according to European Society of Hypertension criteria 5, with comparable accuracy to Spacelabs but better patient comfort 4, 3
Newer cuffless technologies are emerging with promising results:
- Wrist-worn photoplethysmography-based devices have shown comparable measurements to standard cuff-based ABPM with significantly less patient inconvenience 6
- The LiveOne wristband device has demonstrated high correlation with invasive arterial line measurements (r=0.91 for SBP, r=0.85 for DBP) 7
Clinical Interpretation Standards
For proper interpretation of ABPM data:
Normal ABPM values 1:
- Daytime: <135/85 mmHg
- Nighttime: <120/70 mmHg
- 24-hour: <130/80 mmHg
Abnormal ABPM values 1:
- Daytime: >140/90 mmHg
- Nighttime: >125/75 mmHg
- 24-hour: >135/85 mmHg
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Inaccurate readings due to:
Misinterpretation of data:
Device-specific issues:
Conclusion
When selecting an ABPM device, healthcare providers should prioritize validated oscillometric devices that balance accuracy with patient comfort. The Mobil-O-Graph NG offers a good combination of accuracy and patient acceptance 4, 5, 3. For patients who find traditional cuff-based monitors too uncomfortable, newer cuffless wrist-worn technologies may offer a promising alternative with comparable accuracy 6, 7, though these require further validation before becoming the standard of care.