Polypoid Low-Grade Dysplasia Similar to Tubular Adenoma
Polypoid low-grade dysplasia similar to tubular adenoma refers to a raised dysplastic lesion in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that histologically resembles a sporadic tubular adenoma but arises in the context of chronic inflammation. These lesions are also known as adenoma-like dysplasia-associated lesions or masses (adenoma-like DALMs) 1.
Histopathological Features
Polypoid low-grade dysplasia in IBD shares several morphological features with sporadic tubular adenomas:
- Glandular architecture resembling tubular adenomas 1
- Neoplastic crypt cells that are elongated and crowded
- Hyperchromatic nuclei that maintain polarity with respect to the basement membrane
- Low-grade dysplastic changes with preserved architecture 1
However, several distinguishing features may help differentiate IBD-related polypoid dysplasia from sporadic adenomas:
- IBD-related features 1:
- Occurs in younger patients (typically <50 years)
- Associated with longer disease duration (>10 years)
- More prominent villous architecture
- Mixture of normal and dysplastic epithelium at the surface
- Increased inflammation within the polyp
- Presence of dysplasia in the stalk (if pedunculated)
- Higher frequency of p53 mutations and lower frequency of KRAS mutations
- May have associated flat dysplasia in surrounding mucosa
Clinical Significance and Management
The distinction between polypoid low-grade dysplasia similar to tubular adenoma (adenoma-like DALM) and non-adenoma-like DALM is crucial for patient management:
Adenoma-like DALMs 1:
- Can be managed with complete polypectomy and continued surveillance
- Lower risk of progression to cancer compared to non-adenoma-like DALMs
- Requires careful examination of surrounding flat mucosa to rule out flat dysplasia
Non-adenoma-like DALMs 1:
- Strong association with synchronous and metachronous carcinoma (38-83%)
- Require colectomy due to high risk of cancer
- Present as velvety patches, plaques, irregular bumps, nodules, or broad-based masses
Important Diagnostic Considerations
Expert pathologist review is essential: Inter-observer agreement is poor for low-grade dysplasia, making confirmation by an expert GI pathologist recommended 1
Sampling of surrounding mucosa: Critical to obtain samples of the surrounding non-elevated mucosa to determine if flat dysplasia is present, which would suggest IBD-related dysplasia rather than a sporadic adenoma 1
Molecular markers: Co-expression of p53 and AMACR may indicate higher risk of progression to advanced neoplasia (86% vs. 27% without co-expression) 1
Surveillance and Follow-up
For patients with polypoid low-grade dysplasia similar to tubular adenoma:
Complete excision is necessary, as incomplete removal of raised adenoma-like dysplasia is associated with a high rate of progression to cancer 1
More intensive surveillance is recommended for distal lesions, as distal low-grade dysplasia progresses more rapidly to cancer than proximal low-grade dysplasia 1
Even subtle villous changes (1-20%) may indicate increased malignant potential, as these lesions show molecular features characteristic of more advanced tubulovillous adenomas 2
Pitfalls to Avoid
Misclassification: Tubular adenomas are often misclassified as tubulovillous or villous adenomas (35% of readings), which can affect surveillance recommendations 3
Missing high-grade dysplasia: High-grade dysplasia is correctly identified in only 47% of cases, missed in 31%, and overcalled as invasive cancer in 22% 3
Incomplete excision: Ensure complete removal of the lesion, as incomplete excision significantly increases cancer risk 1
Neglecting surrounding mucosa: Always sample and examine the surrounding flat mucosa for dysplasia 1