Is Sultamicillin (Ampicillin/Sulbactam) effective against Pseudomonas and Klebsiella infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sultamicillin (Ampicillin/Sulbactam) Effectiveness Against Pseudomonas and Klebsiella

Sultamicillin (ampicillin/sulbactam) is effective against Klebsiella species but NOT effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

Effectiveness Against Klebsiella

Ampicillin/sulbactam demonstrates activity against Klebsiella species through several mechanisms:

  • Sulbactam acts as a beta-lactamase inhibitor that irreversibly inactivates beta-lactamases produced by many organisms, including Klebsiella 1
  • Clinical guidelines specifically mention ampicillin/sulbactam as an appropriate treatment option for infections involving Klebsiella species 2
  • In clinical practice, ampicillin/sulbactam is used for community-acquired infections of mild-to-moderate severity, including those caused by Klebsiella 3

However, there are important limitations to consider:

  • Increasing resistance rates have been reported for Klebsiella species
  • The 2010 guidelines for intra-abdominal infections specifically state: "Ampicillin-sulbactam is not recommended for use because of high rates of resistance to this agent among community-acquired E. coli" 2
  • This suggests caution when using this agent empirically for Enterobacteriaceae infections

Ineffectiveness Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Multiple guidelines and research clearly indicate that ampicillin/sulbactam is NOT effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa:

  • Ampicillin-sulbactam "is not active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa" as explicitly stated in research evidence 3
  • When treating ventilator-associated pneumonia with suspected Pseudomonas infection, guidelines recommend antipseudomonal agents such as:
    • Antipseudomonal cephalosporins (cefepime or ceftazidime)
    • Antipseudomonal carbapenems (imipenem or meropenem)
    • Piperacillin-tazobactam 2
  • For Pseudomonas infections, guidelines consistently recommend other agents like ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, or combination therapy 2

Important Clinical Considerations

  1. For Klebsiella infections:

    • Ampicillin/sulbactam may be considered for mild-to-moderate community-acquired infections
    • Local resistance patterns should guide therapy
    • For severe infections or healthcare-associated infections, broader-spectrum agents may be preferred
  2. For Pseudomonas infections:

    • Never use ampicillin/sulbactam as it lacks activity against P. aeruginosa
    • Consider antipseudomonal agents like:
      • Ceftolozane-tazobactam
      • Ceftazidime-avibactam
      • Piperacillin-tazobactam
      • Meropenem or imipenem
      • Combination therapy for severe infections
  3. Exception note: While ampicillin/sulbactam is not effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, there is limited evidence suggesting sulbactam alone may have some activity against certain Pseudomonas species like Pseudomonas cepacia (now Burkholderia cepacia) 4, but this does not extend to the clinically important P. aeruginosa.

Conclusion

When considering sultamicillin (ampicillin/sulbactam) for treatment:

  • May be appropriate for Klebsiella infections in certain clinical scenarios
  • Never appropriate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections
  • Always consider local resistance patterns and severity of infection when selecting antimicrobial therapy

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Pseudomonas cepacia susceptibility to sulbactam.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1989

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.