Recommended Laboratory Tests for Assessing Inflammatory Response
C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are the primary laboratory tests recommended for assessing inflammatory response, with CRP being the preferred first-line test due to its superior analytical characteristics and established clinical utility. 1
Primary Inflammatory Markers
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
- First-line test for inflammatory assessment 1
- More sensitive for acute inflammation and responds quickly to changes (rises within 4-6 hours)
- Better for monitoring response to therapy
- Interpretation guidelines:
- <1.0 mg/L: Low risk/minimal inflammation
- 1.0-3.0 mg/L: Average risk/moderate inflammation
3.0 mg/L: High risk/significant inflammation
10 mg/L: Suggests acute infection or significant inflammation requiring investigation 1
- High-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) is specifically recommended for cardiovascular risk assessment 1
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
- Indirect measure of fibrinogen and other acute phase proteins
- Rises more slowly and remains elevated longer than CRP
- Better for monitoring chronic inflammatory conditions 1, 2
- Affected by factors such as renal disease, female sex, and older age 3
- Particularly valuable in detecting low-grade bone infections and monitoring certain autoimmune diseases 1, 3
Additional Inflammatory Markers
Complete Blood Count
- White blood cell (WBC) count with differential provides information about the type of inflammation 1
- Neutrophilia suggests bacterial infection
- Lymphocytosis suggests viral infection or certain chronic inflammatory conditions
Fibrinogen
- Acute phase protein associated with cardiovascular disease risk
- Has a longer half-life than CRP 1
Specialized Inflammatory Markers
- Fecal calprotectin: For intestinal inflammation 1, 4
- Serum amyloid A (SAA): Acute phase protein elevated in inflammatory conditions 1
- Disease-specific markers:
Interpretation of Combined Inflammatory Markers
| CRP | ESR | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Elevated | Normal | Acute inflammation (e.g., infections, early inflammation) |
| Normal | Elevated | Chronic inflammation (e.g., autoimmune diseases, stroke) |
| Elevated | Elevated | Active inflammation (both acute and chronic processes) |
| Normal | Normal | Low likelihood of significant inflammation [1] |
Clinical Considerations
When to Order Both CRP and ESR
- Discordance between CRP and ESR occurs in approximately 12% of patients 5
- High CRP/low ESR pattern: Associated with acute infections, urinary tract infections, gastrointestinal infections, pneumonia, and myocardial infarction 5
- High ESR/low CRP pattern: Associated with connective tissue diseases, bone/joint infections, and ischemic stroke 5
Limitations and Pitfalls
- Neither test is specific for a particular disease
- CRP can be elevated in non-infectious conditions like obesity 1
- ESR has more false positive and false negative results than CRP 3
- Do not dismiss elevated ESR when CRP is normal, as this pattern can occur in several serious conditions 1
- Treat the underlying cause of inflammation, not the elevated marker itself 1
- Always interpret inflammatory markers in clinical context 1
Monitoring Recommendations
- For optimal assessment, obtain samples when the patient is metabolically stable 1
- Consider two measurements (optimally 2 weeks apart) for a stable estimate 1
- Monitor inflammatory markers approximately 4 weeks after initiating therapy 1
Disease-Specific Recommendations
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- CRP and fecal calprotectin are recommended for assessment and monitoring 4
- Consider routine laboratory investigations including complete blood count, liver profile, albumin, and iron studies 4
Inflammatory Arthritis
- Consider autoimmune blood panel including ANA, RF, anti-CCP, ESR, and CRP 4
- Monitor with serial examinations including inflammatory markers every 4-6 weeks after treatment initiation 4
Suspected Bone/Joint Infection
- Both ESR and CRP should be assessed, as discordance may occur 6
- ESR has particular value in detecting low-grade bone infections 3
By following these recommendations for inflammatory marker testing, clinicians can effectively assess inflammatory responses and monitor treatment outcomes while avoiding common pitfalls in interpretation.