What is the recommended approach for Modified Radical Neck Dissection (MRND) incisions?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Modified Radical Neck Dissection (MRND) Incisions: Recommended Approaches

For Modified Radical Neck Dissection (MRND), the recommended approach is to use either a comprehensive or selective neck dissection based on the extent of nodal disease, with incisions designed to provide adequate exposure while preserving critical structures and minimizing morbidity. 1

Classification of Neck Dissections

Modern neck dissection approaches are classified as either:

  1. Comprehensive Neck Dissection:

    • Removes all lymph node groups (levels I-V) that would be included in a classic radical neck dissection
    • Whether the sternocleidomastoid muscle, jugular vein, or spinal accessory nerve is preserved does not affect the classification as comprehensive
    • Typically recommended for patients with extensive nodal disease (N3) 2, 1
  2. Selective Neck Dissection:

    • Removes only specific lymph node groups at highest risk for metastases based on the primary tumor site
    • Tailored according to the primary tumor location:
      • Oral Cavity: Levels I-III (sometimes including superior parts of level V)
      • Oropharynx, Hypopharynx, Larynx: Levels II-IV (and level VI when appropriate)
    • Typically performed for N0 disease or cases with low neck tumor burden 2, 1

Incision Selection

The choice of incision depends on several factors:

  1. Standard Approach: Extended collar incision is commonly used for most MRND procedures 3

  2. For High Lesions: When lymph node metastasis is present at the upper bifurcation of the carotid artery, a modified MacFee incision may be preferred 3

  3. For Extensive Disease: When access to multiple levels is required, particularly for comprehensive neck dissection, a single extended transverse incision provides adequate exposure 4

  4. Alternative Approaches:

    • Retroauricular approach has been developed for better cosmetic results in selected cases 4, 5
    • Extra-thyroideal space approach (MRND vets) through a traditional Kocher incision may be considered for papillary thyroid carcinoma cases, offering lower morbidity and better cosmetic results 6

Key Surgical Principles

  • Preserve critical structures when possible (jugular vein, sternocleidomastoid muscle, and accessory nerve) to conserve function and cosmesis 3

  • Avoid taping of the carotid artery or sternocleidomastoid muscle unless tumor invasion is present 3

  • For therapeutic dissections, the extent of neck dissection depends on the primary tumor location and the level of nodal involvement 2

  • Bilateral neck dissection may be necessary for tumors at or near the midline and/or for tumor sites with bilateral drainage 2

Complications and Considerations

  • MRND procedures carry risk of complications including shoulder dysfunction, lymphedema, cosmetic deformity, and wound healing issues 1

  • Salvage neck dissection after prior treatment has increased risk of complications including delayed wound healing, skin necrosis, and carotid exposure 2, 1

  • Careful preoperative assessment of the extent of disease is essential for proper planning of the incision and extent of dissection 2

  • Knowledge of neck anatomy, precise staging, prognostic evaluation, and surgical experience are necessary for successful MRND 3

By following these guidelines for MRND incisions and approaches, surgeons can achieve optimal oncologic outcomes while minimizing morbidity and preserving quality of life for patients requiring neck dissection.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.