What is a pericardial window and what are its indications?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pericardial Window: Definition and Indications

A pericardial window is a surgical procedure that creates a communication between the pericardial space and pleural cavity to allow drainage of pericardial effusion and prevent cardiac tamponade, primarily indicated for recurrent large pericardial effusions or cardiac tamponade, especially in patients with malignant disease or when pericardiectomy poses high risk due to patient condition or limited life expectancy. 1, 2

Definition and Procedure

A pericardial window involves:

  • Surgical creation of a 3-4 cm opening in the pericardium to allow continuous drainage of fluid
  • Can be performed via:
    • Subxiphoid approach
    • Left anterior thoracotomy
    • Video-assisted thoracoscopy
    • Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy (less common)
  • The procedure allows pericardial fluid to drain into the pleural or peritoneal cavity 1, 2

Primary Indications

  1. Recurrent large pericardial effusions that continue to accumulate despite drainage 1, 2

  2. Cardiac tamponade, especially:

    • When due to malignancy
    • When recurrent despite pericardiocentesis 2
  3. Malignant pericardial effusion with high likelihood of recurrence 2

  4. Palliative management in patients with:

    • Limited life expectancy
    • High surgical risk for more definitive procedures like pericardiectomy 1
  5. Failed pericardiocentesis or when pericardiocentesis is contraindicated 2

  6. Loculated effusions not amenable to needle drainage 2

Clinical Considerations

  • Efficacy: 90-97% effective for large malignant effusions and recurrent tamponade 2

  • Limitations: Less definitive than pericardiectomy, with recurrence rates of 40-70% possible 1, 2

  • Contraindications: Should be avoided in purulent effusions 1

  • Complications:

    • Wound infection
    • Pneumothorax
    • Myocardial laceration (rare)
    • Acute left ventricular failure (rare but serious) 3

Diagnostic Value

  • Allows for collection of pericardial fluid and tissue for:
    • Cytological analysis (especially important in suspected malignancy)
    • Bacterial cultures
    • Histological/immunohistological evaluation
    • PCR for microbial agents 1, 2

Alternative Approaches

  • Pericardiocentesis: First-line for acute tamponade, but has higher recurrence rates
  • Pericardiectomy: More definitive but more invasive option for recurrent effusions
  • Pericardial-peritoneal window: Alternative approach creating drainage into peritoneal cavity 4
  • Percutaneous balloon pericardial window: Less invasive option for selected cases 5

Post-Procedure Management

  • Echocardiographic follow-up to monitor for recurrence
  • Treatment of underlying cause (especially important in malignancy)
  • Coordination with oncology in cases of malignant effusion 2

Remember that while a pericardial window provides immediate relief and diagnostic material, addressing the underlying cause of the effusion remains essential for long-term management.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pericardial Disease Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Pericardial window procedures: Implications on left ventricular function.

International journal of surgery case reports, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.