Evolution of Wound Cleansing Practices: From Iodine to Saline
The shift from routine iodine use to saline for wound cleansing represents evidence-based practice that prioritizes wound healing while reserving antimicrobial agents for specific clinical indications.
Current Best Practice for Wound Cleansing
- Clean wounds regularly with clean water or saline, and dress them with sterile, inert dressings to control exudate and maintain a warm, moist environment for optimal healing 1
- Select dressings principally based on exudate control, comfort, and cost rather than antimicrobial properties 1
- Reserve antimicrobial dressings (including iodine-based products) for specific clinical indications rather than routine use 1
Why the Change from Routine Iodine Use
Evidence Against Routine Antimicrobial Use
- Current guidelines strongly recommend against using antimicrobial dressings with the goal of improving wound healing or preventing secondary infection 1
- The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) explicitly states: "Do not use antimicrobial dressings with the goal of improving wound healing or preventing secondary infection" (strong recommendation, moderate evidence) 1
- No evidence supports one form of topical agent over another for routine wound care 1
Specific Indications for Iodine
Iodine is now reserved for wounds with:
- Active infection
- Foul odor
- Purulent drainage
- Necrotic tissue
- When autolytic debridement is needed
Scientific Rationale for the Change
Potential Disadvantages of Routine Iodine Use
- Traditional agents like povidone-iodine can be more tissue toxic than their common usage would indicate 2
- Antiseptic agents show no benefit over simple irrigation for clean wounds 3
- No evidence that antimicrobial dressings improve healing outcomes in non-infected wounds 1
Benefits of Saline Cleansing
- Normal saline is isotonic and does not interfere with the normal healing process 4
- Saline is cost-effective and readily available 5
- Clean water or saline is sufficient for regular wound cleansing 1, 4
Modern Approach to Wound Management
Wound Assessment and Cleansing Protocol
- Assess wound for signs of infection (redness, swelling, increasing pain, purulent drainage, foul odor)
- For routine, non-infected wounds:
- Clean with saline or clean water
- Apply appropriate dressing based on wound characteristics
- For infected or compromised wounds:
- Consider antimicrobial agents including iodine products
- Select based on specific wound characteristics and clinical presentation
Specific Situations for Iodine Use
- When biofilm is present or suspected (iodine can help destroy and inhibit biofilm formation) 1
- For wounds with signs of infection (temperature >38.5°C, heart rate >110 beats/minute, erythema extending >5 cm) 3
- When necrotic tissue is present and requires debridement 1
Evidence on Iodine Efficacy
Despite the shift away from routine use, iodine remains an effective antiseptic when indicated:
- Systematic review evidence shows iodine is an effective antiseptic agent that does not delay wound healing, particularly in chronic and burn wounds 6
- Iodine's antiseptic effect is not inferior to other agents and does not impair wound healing when used appropriately 6
Best Practice Summary
- For routine wound care: Use saline or clean water for cleansing, and select dressings based on wound characteristics rather than antimicrobial properties
- For infected or compromised wounds: Consider appropriate antimicrobial agents including iodine-based products
- For debridement needs: Sharp debridement is preferred when possible, but antimicrobial agents including iodine may be appropriate for autolytic debridement 1
This evidence-based approach ensures that wound care is targeted and appropriate, avoiding unnecessary use of antimicrobial agents while ensuring they are available when clinically indicated.