Is cisapride (a gastroprokinetic agent) safe for use in the management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cisapride Is Not Safe for GERD Management Due to Serious Cardiac Risks

Cisapride should not be used for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) due to its association with serious cardiac adverse events including fatal arrhythmias and sudden death. 1, 2

Safety Concerns and Regulatory Status

  • Cisapride was removed from the US market because of reports of serious cardiac adverse effects:
    • 341 cases of ventricular arrhythmias including 80 deaths were reported to the FDA 2
    • The drug can cause QT interval prolongation, predisposing patients to potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmias 2
    • Since July 2000, cisapride has been restricted in the USA and Europe to limited access programs supervised by pediatric gastroenterologists 3

Efficacy Evidence

Despite the safety concerns, the evidence for cisapride's efficacy in GERD is mixed:

  • A Cochrane systematic review found no clear evidence that cisapride reduces symptoms of GOR in children 3
  • While cisapride did reduce the reflux index in some studies (weighted mean difference -6.49; 95% CI -10.13 to -2.85), this physiological improvement did not consistently translate to clinical symptom improvement 3
  • An earlier review noted that cisapride was "of limited value in maintenance therapy of GORD in patients in whom symptom relief has been accomplished with potent antisecretory medication" 4

Current Recommended Alternatives for GERD Management

  1. Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs):

    • First-line pharmacological treatment for GERD 5
    • Examples: omeprazole (20-40mg), lansoprazole (15-30mg), esomeprazole (20-40mg), rabeprazole (20mg)
    • More effective than prokinetic agents for symptom control and healing of esophagitis 1
  2. H2-Receptor Antagonists:

    • Effective alternatives for milder cases 5
    • Examples: ranitidine, famotidine
  3. Lifestyle Modifications:

    • Weight loss if overweight/obese
    • Avoiding meals 2-3 hours before lying down
    • Elevating the head of bed 6-8 inches
    • Avoiding trigger foods
    • Smoking cessation 5

Important Considerations for Special Populations

  • Pediatric patients: The American Academy of Pediatrics specifically notes that there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of any prokinetic agent for the treatment of GERD in infants or older children 1

  • Pregnant patients: A step-up approach is recommended, starting with lifestyle modifications, then antacids, sucralfate, H2-receptor antagonists, and finally PPIs for refractory cases 5

Conclusion

The risk-benefit profile of cisapride for GERD management is clearly unfavorable. The potential for serious cardiac adverse events, including fatal arrhythmias, far outweighs any potential benefits, especially when safer and more effective alternatives like PPIs are available. Current guidelines do not support the use of cisapride for GERD management, and the drug remains available only through restricted access programs in most countries.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Drug interactions with cisapride: clinical implications.

Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2000

Research

Cisapride treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux in children.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010

Guideline

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.