Which of the following tumors is most likely to be multiple: (a) gastrinoma, (b) insulinoma, (c) somatostatinoma, (d) vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-producing tumor, or (e) glucagonoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Gastrinoma is Most Likely to be Multiple Among Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Among the listed pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, gastrinoma is most likely to be multiple, particularly in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome. 1

Evidence Supporting Gastrinoma as Most Likely to be Multiple

Epidemiology and Association with MEN1

  • Gastrinomas occur in 25-40% of MEN1 patients, compared to much lower rates for other pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors 1
  • Approximately 70% of patients with MEN1 and gastrinoma have tumors situated in the duodenum 1
  • Pancreatic NETs occurring in patients with MEN1 are typically multiple, with gastrinoma and insulinoma being the most common types 1

Comparison with Other Listed Tumors

  1. Insulinoma:

    • While insulinomas are common in MEN1 patients, approximately 90% of insulinomas are benign and typically solitary in sporadic cases 2
    • Only about 5% of insulinomas are associated with MEN1 syndrome 1
  2. Somatostatinoma:

    • Very rare tumor with lower association with MEN1 compared to gastrinomas
    • Only 0.65% of MEN1 patients with duodeno-pancreatic involvement have somatostatinomas 3
  3. VIPoma (Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide-producing tumor):

    • Only about 5% of VIPomas are associated with MEN1 syndrome 1
    • Only 0.98% of MEN1 patients with duodeno-pancreatic involvement have VIPomas 3
  4. Glucagonoma:

    • Only about 10% of glucagonomas are associated with MEN1 syndrome 1
    • Only 1.6% of MEN1 patients with duodeno-pancreatic involvement have glucagonomas 3

Clinical Significance

Understanding which pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are likely to be multiple has important implications for:

  • Surgical planning: Multiple tumors require different surgical approaches than solitary tumors
  • Surveillance strategies: Patients with MEN1 require ongoing monitoring for development of new tumors
  • Genetic counseling: Identification of multiple gastrinomas should prompt consideration of MEN1 syndrome

Molecular Basis for Multiple Gastrinomas

In sporadic (non-MEN1) cases of gastrinoma, when multiple tumors are present, they typically represent metastases from a single primary tumor. Research has shown that sporadic gastrinomas at multiple sites are monoclonal, with identical MEN1 gene alterations occurring before the development of tumor metastases 4.

In contrast, in MEN1 syndrome, multiple gastrinomas arise from independent clonal events, representing true multiple primary tumors rather than metastases.

Key Diagnostic and Management Considerations

  • When multiple gastrinomas are identified, MEN1 syndrome should be suspected and appropriate genetic testing considered
  • Imaging studies including multiphasic CT/MRI, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and endoscopic ultrasound are important for identifying all tumor sites
  • Surgical management strategies differ significantly between solitary and multiple tumors

In conclusion, while all the listed pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors can potentially be multiple, especially in MEN1 syndrome, gastrinoma has the highest likelihood of multiplicity based on its strong association with MEN1 and clinical evidence.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Insulinomas Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.