Treatment Recommendations for Patients with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction
For patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction (LVEF 41-49%), SGLT2 inhibitors are the most strongly recommended treatment, followed by evidence-based beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors/ARBs/ARNi, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. 1
First-Line Treatments
SGLT2 Inhibitors (Class 2a, Level B-R)
- SGLT2 inhibitors such as empagliflozin or dapagliflozin (10mg daily) should be initiated for patients with HFmrEF
- The EMPEROR-Preserved trial demonstrated a 21% reduction in the composite endpoint of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, primarily driven by a 29% reduction in HF hospitalizations 1
- Benefits were consistent regardless of diabetes status
- Consider initiating in-hospital once the patient is stabilized
Beta-Blockers (Class 2b, Level B-NR)
- Evidence-based beta-blockers that have demonstrated mortality benefit in HFrEF should be used:
- The BBmeta-HF analysis showed that in patients with LVEF 40-49% in sinus rhythm, beta-blockers reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality 1
- Beta-blockers should be initiated at low doses and gradually titrated while monitoring heart rate and blood pressure
Additional Recommended Therapies
Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors (Class 2b, Level B-NR)
- Options include:
- A subgroup analysis of PARAGON-HF suggested benefit of sacubitril-valsartan versus valsartan alone in patients with LVEF 45-57% (rate ratio 0.78; 95% CI 0.64-0.95) 1
- ACE inhibitors should be considered first-line (over ARBs) based on evidence for reducing MI risk and prevention of heart failure 3
- ARBs are appropriate alternatives for patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (Class 2b, Level B-NR)
- Options include:
- MRAs should be used with careful monitoring of potassium and renal function
- Particularly beneficial for patients with LVEF on the lower end of the HFmrEF spectrum (closer to 40%)
Practical Implementation Approach
Initial Assessment:
- Confirm LVEF is between 41-49% via echocardiography
- Assess volume status to guide diuretic therapy
- Evaluate renal function and electrolytes
Treatment Algorithm:
- Start with SGLT2 inhibitor (strongest recommendation)
- Add evidence-based beta-blocker at low dose
- Initiate ACEi/ARB/ARNi at low dose
- Consider adding MRA if symptoms persist and renal function allows
- Titrate medications to target doses as tolerated
Monitoring:
- Check electrolytes and renal function 1-2 weeks after initiation and dose changes
- Monitor blood pressure and heart rate regularly
- Reassess LVEF after 3-6 months of optimal therapy
Important Considerations and Caveats
Medication Titration: Uptitration of medications to target doses is associated with better outcomes. A study showed that patients receiving at least one drug at ≥50% of target dose had significantly better outcomes than those on low doses or no treatment 4
Treatment Intensification: Intensification of therapy during hospitalization for acute heart failure is associated with lower rates of death and rehospitalization (adjusted HR 0.49,95% CI 0.29-0.83) 4
Avoid Downtitration: Downtitration of guideline-directed medical therapy after procedures like percutaneous mitral valve repair is associated with poor prognosis (HR 2.54,95% CI 1.38-4.69) 5
Early Initiation: Early prescription of ACEi/ARB in patients with acute heart failure before hemodynamic stabilization appears safe and may be associated with lower incidence of worsening heart failure 6
Diuretic Therapy: Loop diuretics should be used as needed for symptom relief and volume management, but they do not modify disease progression 1
LVEF Trajectory: Patients with HFmrEF should have repeat evaluation of LVEF to determine the trajectory of their disease process, as this may influence treatment decisions 1
Special Populations: For patients with concomitant hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or ischemic heart disease, early initiation of ACEi/ARB therapy may be particularly beneficial 6
The treatment approach for HFmrEF is evolving, with increasing evidence supporting the use of therapies traditionally reserved for HFrEF. While there are no prospective RCTs specifically for HFmrEF patients, post-hoc analyses suggest that patients with LVEF 41-49% respond to medical therapies similarly to patients with HFrEF, particularly those with LVEF on the lower end of this spectrum.